ReviewOncotarget2017
The best strategy for HCC patients at each BCLC stage: a network meta-analysis of observational studies.
Review in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adjuvant celecoxib and lanreotide following transarterial chemoembolisation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized pilot study.Oncotarget · 2017Trial
- The application ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Review
- Immunotherapy and Transarterial therapy of HCC: What the interventional radiologist needs to know about the changing landscape of HCC treatment?Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2022Article
- Long Non-Coding RNA MAFG-AS1 as a Potential Biomarker for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Linkage with Tumor Features, Markers, Liver Functions, and Survival Profile.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles: A New Therapeutic Tool in Liver Diseases.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Two elder cases of hepatocellular carcinoma adjacent to intrahepatic vessels successfully treated by carbon ion radiotherapy.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- The 100 most influential manuscripts on hepatocellular carcinoma: a bibliometric analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2019Review
- Review
- Evaluation of Targeted Agents for Advanced and Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of Cancer · 2019Article
- Intra-Arterial TheraSphere Yttrium-90 Glass Microspheres in the Treatment of Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Protocol for the STOP-HCC Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2018Article
- Efficacy of bi-monthly hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2018Article
- NEAT1_2-SFPQ axis mediates cisplatin resistance in liver cancer cells in vitro.OncoTargets and therapy · 2018Article
- Identifying the Best Anticancer Agent Combination in TACE for HCC Patients: A Network Meta-analysis.Journal of Cancer · 2018Review
- Reduced miR-125a levels associated with poor survival of patients with hepatocellular cancer.Oncology letters · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsCurrently, the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system remains huge controversies in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. To determine the best therapeutic strategy for patients at each stage, we conducted a network meta-analysis and aimed to provide a new treatment concept. MATERIALS AND
methodsPubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library database were searched for observational studies up to August 31, 2016. We extracted data on overall survival rate from studies that compared various strategies for use with patients at different stages. Network meta-analysis was conducted by evaluating the different overall survival rate of each stage. Cumulative probability value was utilized to rank the strategies under examination. A node-splitting model was employed to assess consistency and inconsistency.
resultsA total of 198 observational studies were included in the network meta-analysis with a focus on Stages 0-D. By comparing the overall survival rate of each stage, the results revealed that liver transplantation and liver transplantation plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization were the best options for patients with Stages 0 and A. The applications of surgical resection plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and surgical resection plus sorafenib were the best strategies for Stages B and C. For Stage D, whole net connection could not be established, but intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy and liver transplantation could be potential primary options.
conclusionsThe existing therapeutic flowchart needs to be updated. Potential best strategies relating to all stages were identified and should be used as references for clinical treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.