Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28099503›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

3D Functional Corneal Stromal Tissue Equivalent Based on Corneal Stromal Stem Cells and Multi-Layered Silk Film Architecture.

Chiara E Ghezzi, Benedetto Marelli, Fiorenzo G Omenetto, James L Funderburgh, David L Kaplan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Bioinspired Tissue Transparency: Achieving Sclera-to-Cornea Transplantation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Lentiviral Vector-MediatedHuman gene therapy · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Fiber-Based Biopolymer Processing as a Route toward Sustainability.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2022
    Review
  14. Tissue Models forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Mechanical Properties of Bioengineered Corneal Stroma.Advanced healthcare materials · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The Human Tissue-Engineered Cornea (hTEC): Recent Progress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chiara E GhezziDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9800-4397
Benedetto MarelliDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Fiorenzo G OmenettoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America.
James L FunderburghDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
David L KaplanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

Translational Bioreactors - Engineering Complex TissuesP41EB002520 · NIBIB · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI KAPLAN, DAVID L. · 2004 to 2018
$16.7M
Stem Cells for Corneal EngineeringR01EY016415 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DU, YIQIN · 2006 to 2018
$4.5M
Tissue Engineering Cornea ReplacementsR01EY020856 · NEI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI KAPLAN, DAVID L. · 2010 to 2016
$2.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016415NEI NIH HHS R01 EY020856NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The worldwide need for human cornea equivalents continues to grow. Few clinical options are limited to allogenic and synthetic material replacements. We hypothesized that tissue engineered human cornea systems based on mechanically robust, patterned, porous, thin, optically clear silk protein films, in combination with human corneal stromal stem cells (hCSSCs), would generate 3D functional corneal stroma tissue equivalents, in comparison to previously developed 2D approaches. Silk film contact guidance was used to control the alignment and distribution of hCSSCs on RGD-treated single porous silk films, which were then stacked in an orthogonally, multi-layered architecture and cultured for 9 weeks. These systems were compared similar systems generated with human corneal fibroblasts (hCFs). Both cell types were viable and preferentially aligned along the biomaterial patterns for up to 9 weeks in culture. H&E histological sections showed that the systems seeded with the hCSSCs displayed ECM production throughout the entire thickness of the constructs. In addition, the ECM proteins tested positive for keratocyte-specific tissue markers, including keratan sulfate, lumican, and keratocan. The quantification of hCSSC gene expression of keratocyte-tissue markers, including keratocan, lumican, human aldehyde dehydrogenase 3A1 (ALDH3A1), prostaglandin D2 synthase (PTDGS), and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase, isozyme 4 (PDK4), within the 3D tissue systems demonstrated upregulation when compared to 2D single silk films and to the systems generated with the hCFs. Furthermore, the production of ECM from the hCSSC seeded systems and subsequent remodeling of the initial matrix significantly improved cohesiveness and mechanical performance of the constructs, while maintaining transparency after 9 weeks.

Indexed as

Cells, CulturedCell SurvivalCorneal KeratocytesCorneal StromaDimethylpolysiloxanesFibroblastsGene Expression RegulationHumansProteoglycansSilkStem CellsStromal CellsTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsbaysilonDimethylpolysiloxanesProteoglycansSilk

Identifiers

PMID28099503
PMCPMC5242458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.