Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28099153›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Building personalized treatment plans for early-stage colorectal cancer patients.

Hung-Hsin Lin, Nien-Chih Wei, Teh-Ying Chou, Chun-Chi Lin, Yuan-Tsu Lan, Shin-Ching Chang, Huann-Sheng Wang, Shung-Haur Yang, Wei-Shone Chen, Tzu-Chen Lin and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chemotherapy-generated cell debris stimulates colon carcinoma tumor growth via osteopontin.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hung-Hsin LinDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.
Nien-Chih WeiAuspex Diagnostics, Taiwan.
Teh-Ying ChouDivision of Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chun-Chi LinDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.
Yuan-Tsu LanDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.
Shin-Ching ChangDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.
Huann-Sheng WangDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.
Shung-Haur YangDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.
Wei-Shone ChenDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.
Tzu-Chen LinDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.
Jen-Kou LinDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.
Jeng-Kai JiangDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a series of models to predict the likelihood of recurrence and the response to chemotherapy for the personalized treatment of stage I and II colorectal cancer patients. A recurrence prediction model was developed from 235 stage I/II patients. The model successfully distinguished between high-risk and low-risk groups, with a hazard ratio of recurrence of 4.66 (p < 0.0001). More importantly, the model was accurate for both stage I (hazard ratio = 5.87, p = 0.0006) and stage II (hazard ratio = 4.30, p < 0.0001) disease. This model performed much better than the Oncotype and ColoPrint commercial services in identifying patients at high risk for stage II recurrence. And unlike the commercial services, the robust model included recurrence prediction for stage I patients. As stage I/II CRC patients usually do not receive chemotherapy, we generated chemotherapy efficacy prediction models with data from 358 stage III patients. The predictions were highly accurate: the hazard ratio of recurrence for responders vs. non-responders was 4.13 for those treated with FOLFOX (p < 0.0001), and 3.16 (p = 0.0012) for those treated with fluorouracil. We have thus created a prognostic model that accurately identifies patients at high risk for recurrence, and the first accurate chemotherapy efficacy prediction model for individual patients. In the future, complete personalized treatment plans for stage I/II patients may be developed if the drug prediction models generated from stage III patients are verified to be effective for stage I and II patients in prospective studies.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAgedArea Under CurveColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrecision MedicineRisk FactorsROC CurveSensitivity and Specificitycolorectal cancerdrug efficacymicroarraypersonalized treatmentrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID28099153
PMCPMC5355140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.