Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28098955›Full record

ArticleCancer2017

The impact of childhood cancer: Perceptions of adult survivors.

Victoria W Willard, James L Klosky, Chenghong Li, Deo Kumar Srivastava, Tara M Brinkman, Leslie L Robison, Melissa M Hudson, Sean Phipps

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. "I don't take for granted that I am doing well today": a mixed methods study on well-being, impact of cancer, and supportive needs in long-term childhood cancer survivors.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Workplace experiences and turnover intention among adult survivors of childhood cancer.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Victoria W WillardDepartment of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
James L KloskyDepartment of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Chenghong LiDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Deo Kumar SrivastavaDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Tara M BrinkmanDepartment of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Leslie L RobisonDepartment of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Melissa M HudsonDepartment of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Sean PhippsDepartment of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
The St. Jude Lifetime CohortU01CA195547 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI HUDSON, MELISSA M, NESS, KIRSTEN KIMBERLIE · 2015 to 2024
$14.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCI NIH HHS U01 CA195547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to describe perceptions and associated risk factors of the impact of cancer on functional outcomes, including social relationships, exercise, finances, and religion, among adult survivors of childhood cancer.

methodsEvaluable participants included 3001 adult survivors (mean age, 32.5 years; range, 18.3-63.8 years; 24.1 years from diagnosis; 50.8% male; 84.9% Caucasian) who were enrolled in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort study. Perceptions of the impact of cancer were assessed using the Brief Cancer Impact Assessment (BCIA). Regression models were used to evaluate risk factors for functional outcomes.

resultsThe median response on the BCIA was a perception that cancer had minimal impact on the domains assessed. Approximately 33.1% to 46.6% of survivors indicated this response across the 4 subscales, although responses ranged from very positive to very negative impact. Other than diagnosis (with survivors of brain tumors generally indicating a more negative impact of cancer, with subscale estimates of -1.25 for caregiving and finance and -1.01 for social and emotional and an odds ratio of 1.83 for exercise and diet), most variability was because of demographic factors, including sex, age, race, education, and employment.

conclusionsThe current findings highlight that many long-term adult survivors perceive minimal impact of childhood cancer on functional aspects of adulthood, including caregiving, finances, exercise, social-emotional relationships, and religion. This suggests that survivors may not be focusing on the influence of likely physical and psychological late effects of their disease in their day-to-day lives. For those who do perceive a negative impact, variability in responses suggests that there are of survivors who may benefit from interventions focused on the achievement of functional goals. Cancer 2017;123:1625-1634. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

EmotionsEmploymentExerciseInterpersonal RelationsNeoplasmsReligionSurvivorsAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle Agedadult survivorschildhood cancerimpact of cancerquality of lifeSt. Jude Lifetime Cohort (SJLife)

Identifiers

PMID28098955
PMCPMC5400693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.