Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28098951›Full record

Trial reportJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2017

Lessons Learned From a Practice-Based, Multisite Intervention Study With Nurse Participants.

Christopher R Friese, Kari Mendelsohn-Victor, Pamela Ginex, Carol M McMahon, Alex J Fauer, Marjorie C McCullagh

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher R FrieseRho, Professor, Department of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kari Mendelsohn-VictorClinical Research Coordinator, Department of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Pamela GinexNurse Scientist, Department of Nursing, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Carol M McMahonNurse Supervisor, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Alex J FauerRho, Undergraduate Student, University of Michigan School of Nursing and the Hillman Foundation Scholars in Nursing Innovation Program, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Marjorie C McCullaghRho, Professor, Department of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMichigan Cancer Research Consortium · US

Funding

Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Oncology Nurses' Protective Equipment UseR01OH010582 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FRIESE, CHRISTOPHER R · 2014 to 2017
$2.3M
ACL HHS R01OH010582NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH010582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify challenges and solutions to the efficient conduct of a multisite, practice-based randomized controlled trial to improve nurses' adherence to personal protective equipment use in ambulatory oncology settings.

designThe Drug Exposure Feedback and Education for Nurses' Safety (DEFENS) study is a clustered, randomized, controlled trial. Participating sites are randomized to Web-based feedback on hazardous drug exposures in the sites plus tailored messages to address barriers versus a control intervention of a Web-based continuing education video. APPROACH: The study principal investigator, the study coordinator, and two site leaders identified challenges to study implementation and potential solutions, plus potential methods to prevent logistical challenges in future studies.

findingsNoteworthy challenges included variation in human subjects' protection policies, grants and contracts budgeting, infrastructure for nursing-led research, and information technology variation. Successful strategies included scheduled Web conferences, site-based study champions, site visits by the principal investigator, and centrally based document preparation. Strategies to improve efficiency in future studies include early and continued engagement with contract personnel in sites, and proposed changes to the common rule concerning human subjects. The DEFENS study successfully recruited 393 nurses across 12 sites. To date, 369 have completed surveys and 174 nurses have viewed educational materials.

conclusionsMultisite studies of nursing personnel are rare and challenging to the existing infrastructure. These barriers can be overcome with strong engagement and planning. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Leadership engagement, onsite staff support, and continuous communication can facilitate successful recruitment to a workplace-based randomized, controlled behavioral trial.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareGuideline AdherenceHealth Care SurveysHumansNeoplasmsNursing StaffPersonal Protective EquipmentEducationenvironmental healthintervention researchsurvey methodologywork environment

Identifiers

PMID28098951
PMCPMC5334367
OpenAlexW2575171093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.