Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28098769›Full record

ArticleNutrients2017

Sensory Acceptability of Infant Cereals with Whole Grain in Infants and Young Children.

Juan Francisco Haro-Vicente, Maria Jose Bernal-Cava, Amparo Lopez-Fernandez, Gaspar Ros-Berruezo, Stefan Bodenstab, Luis Manuel Sanchez-Siles

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juan Francisco Haro-VicenteDepartment of Research and Development, Hero Group, Alcantarilla, Murcia 30820, Spain. jfrancisco.haro@hero.es.
Maria Jose Bernal-CavaDepartment of Research and Development, Hero Group, Alcantarilla, Murcia 30820, Spain. mjose.bernal@hero.es.
Amparo Lopez-FernandezDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, Espinardo, Murcia 30071, Spain. amparolf@um.es.
Gaspar Ros-BerruezoDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, Espinardo, Murcia 30071, Spain. gros@um.es.
Stefan BodenstabDepartment of Research and Development, Hero Group, Lenzburg 5600, Switzerland. stefan.bodenstab@hero.ch.
Luis Manuel Sanchez-SilesDepartment of Research and Development, Hero Group, Lenzburg 5600, Switzerland. luisma.sanchez@hero.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many countries, infant cereals are one of the first foods introduced during the complementary feeding stage. These cereals are usually made with refined cereal flours, even though several health benefits have been linked to the intake of whole grain cereals. Prior evidence suggests that food preferences are developed at early stages of life, and may persist in later childhood and adulthood. Our aim was to test whether an infant cereal with 30% of whole grain was similarly accepted both by parents and infants in comparison to a similar cereal made from refined flour. A total of 81 infants between 4 and 24 months old were included in the study. Parent-infant pairs participated in an 8-day experimental study. Acceptance was rated on hedonic scales (4-points for infants and 7-points for parents). Other attributes like color, smell, and taste were evaluated by the parents. Acceptability for infant cereals with whole grain and refined cereals was very similar both for infants (2.30 ± 0.12 and 2.32 ± 0.11,

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorFoods, SpecializedTasteAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleFlourFood PreferencesHumansInfantInfant FormulaInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMaleMilk, HumanWhole Grainsacceptabilitycomplementary feedinginfant cerealswhole grain

Identifiers

PMID28098769
PMCPMC5295109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.