Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28097626›Full record

Trial reportTranslational behavioral medicine2017

Peer mentors delivering a physical activity intervention for cancer survivors: effects among mentors.

Bernardine M Pinto, Shira Dunsiger, Kevin Stein, Chelsey Kamson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational behavioral medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Peer Mentors for People with Advanced Cancer: Lessons Learnt from Recruiting and Training Peer Mentors for a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring the reasons for wanting a peer partner to be physically active among women living with and beyond a cancer diagnosis: a content analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  8. Matched and moving: exploring daily social support among women partnered for exercise after a breast cancer diagnosis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  9. Studying the implementation of exercise oncology interventions: a path forward.Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Lesson Learned from Peer Volunteers in a Peer-Led Pain Management Program among Nursing Home Residents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bernardine M PintoCollege of Nursing, University of South Carolina, 1601 Greene Street, Room 302B, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. pintob@mailbox.sc.edu.
Shira DunsigerMiriam Hospital and W. Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Kevin SteinAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Chelsey KamsonRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Community Volunteers Promoting Physical Activity Among Cancer SurvivorsR01CA132854 · NCI · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI PINTO, BERNARDINE M. · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 132854NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To further inform implementation efforts of a telephone-based physical activity (PA) intervention for breast cancer survivors, we assessed the PA, fatigue, mood, and quality of life of the peer mentors/coaches who delivered the program. The coaches were volunteers with the American Cancer Society's Reach to Recovery program. The coaches (n = 18) delivered the PA intervention to 76 breast cancer survivors in a randomized controlled trial. Coaches completed assessments of PA (self-report), motivational readiness for PA, and standardized measures of psychosocial variables at the start of coaching and at study exit. At study exit, they also responded to an open-ended question on the benefits that they accrued from the study. We used generalized linear models to analyze the PA data and psychosocial variables. Chi-squared analyses were used for motivational readiness. The written responses to the open-ended question were analyzed to identify themes. Coaches' PA exceeded national recommendations at study entry and exit with no significant changes over time. Sixty-one percent were in the maintenance stage of motivational readiness, and 61% remained in the same stage at study exit. Psychosocial functioning also remained stable over time. Qualitative data revealed that the coaches' gains included helping themselves (with four subthemes) and helping others. Intervention delivery had no unintended negative consequences (PA, motivational readiness, and psychosocial functioning) among coaches. They reported gains that were not reflected in standardized psychosocial assessments. These data support further implementation of peer-delivered PA programs to enhance the reach of interventions.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsExerciseHealth PromotionMentoringPeer GroupAffectBreast NeoplasmsFatigueFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMentorsMiddle AgedMotivationQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeBreast cancer survivorsCoachesPeer mentorsPhysical activity interventions

Identifiers

PMID28097626
PMCPMC5684062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.