Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28097625›Full record

Trial reportTranslational behavioral medicine2017

Effects of a web-based intervention on women's breast health behaviors.

Deborah J Bowen, Robert Robbins, Nigel Bush, Hendrika Meischke, Abi Ludwig, Jean Wooldridge

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational behavioral medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Personalizing cancer risk: a systematic review of risk communication strategies.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Comparative Effectiveness of Two Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening for Those at Increased Risk Based on Family History: Results of a Randomized Trial.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deborah J BowenFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., MP-900, Seattle, WA, 98109-1024, USA. dbowen@uw.org.
Robert RobbinsFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., MP-900, Seattle, WA, 98109-1024, USA.
Nigel BushFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., MP-900, Seattle, WA, 98109-1024, USA.
Hendrika MeischkeFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., MP-900, Seattle, WA, 98109-1024, USA.
Abi LudwigFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., MP-900, Seattle, WA, 98109-1024, USA.
Jean WooldridgeFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., MP-900, Seattle, WA, 98109-1024, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helping women make choices to reduce cancer risk and to improve breast health behaviors is important, but the best ways to reach more people with intervention assistance is not known. To test the efficacy of a web-based intervention designed to help women make better breast health choices, we adapted our previously tested, successful breast health intervention package to be delivered on the Internet, and then we tested it in a randomized trial. We recruited women from the general public to be randomized to either an active intervention group or a delayed intervention control group. The intervention consisted of a specialized website providing tailored and personalized risk information to all participants, followed by offers of additional support if needed. Follow-up at one-year post randomization revealed significant improvements in mammography screening in intervention women compared with control women (improvement of 13 percentage points). The intervention effects were more powerful in women who increased breast health knowledge and decreased cancer worry during intervention. These data indicate that increases in mammography can be accomplished in population-based mostly insured samples by implementing this simple, low resource intensive intervention.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth PromotionInternetAdolescentAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenetic TestingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRisk AssessmentGenetic testingMammography screeningRandomized trialWeb/Internet intervention

Identifiers

PMID28097625
PMCPMC5526799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.