Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28097487›Full record

ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2017

Inter-Individual Responses of Maximal Oxygen Uptake to Exercise Training: A Critical Review.

Philip J Williamson, Greg Atkinson, Alan M Batterham

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Standard Deviation of Individual Response for VOSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Exercise-based interventions targeting balance and falls in people with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Genes · 2025
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philip J WilliamsonHealth and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BX, UK. P.Williamson@tees.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8184-2132
Greg AtkinsonHealth and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BX, UK.
Alan M BatterhamHealth and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BX, UK.
Teesside University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has recently been reported how to quantify inter-individual differences in the response to an exercise intervention using the standard deviation of the change scores, as well as how to appraise these differences for clinical relevance. In a parallel-group randomised controlled trial, the key trigger for further investigation into inter-individual responses is when the standard deviation of change in the intervention sample is substantially larger than the same standard deviation derived from a suitable comparator sample. 'True' and clinically relevant inter-individual differences in response can then be plausibly expected, and potential moderators and mediators of the inter-individual differences can be explored. We now aim to critically review the research on the inter-individual differences in response to exercise training, focusing on maximal oxygen uptake (VO

Indexed as

Oxygen ConsumptionExerciseExercise TestHumansOxygenReproducibility of ResultsOxygen

Identifiers

PMID28097487
OpenAlexW3014234566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.