Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28097450›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2017

Contemporary thoughts on the management of Spigelian hernia.

V Webber, C Low, R J E Skipworth, S Kumar, A C de Beaux, B Tulloh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Distinguishing abdominal wall denervation injury from normal anatomy via cross section imaging.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Missed Abdominal Wall Hernias.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  10. Robotic repair of a traumatic Spigelian hernia.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Is there a link between Spigelian and inguinal hernias? A case series.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Spigelian hernia: current approaches to surgical treatment-a review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

V WebberDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
C LowDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
R J E SkipworthDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
S KumarDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
A C de BeauxDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
B TullohDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK. bruce.tulloh@nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0026-2214

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpigelian hernias are said to be a rare condition of the elderly population, usually arising below the arcuate line. Local experience has led us to challenge these commonly held beliefs.

methodsOperations for Spigelian hernia from 2006-2016 were identified from the Edinburgh Lothian Surgical Audit computerised database and case notes were reviewed.

resultsOne hundred and one patients underwent surgery for 107 Spigelian hernias in the 10-year period. The female-to-male ratio was 2:1. Ages ranged from 32 to 88 with a median of 64 years. Sixty-five operations were done open and 42 were laparoscopic. Twelve of the 27 for which the precise anatomic location was recorded were situated above the arcuate line. Twenty-nine hernias had small defects and comprised interstitial fat only with no peritoneal sac. Ages in this group ranged from 32 to 80 (median = 48 years). All presented with intermittent local pain and/or swelling, although in three patients the hernias were impalpable. Those three also underwent ultrasound, CT and/or laparoscopy, but the hernias were only identified after open surgical exploration. The remaining 78 cases had peritoneal sacs of varying size with defects up to 9 cm across, and all were identified on imaging and/or laparoscopy. Ages ranged from 38 to 88 (median = 67 years; p < 0.01). Eighteen patients presented as emergencies and all were in this group.

conclusionSpigelian hernias may be more common than we think and are probably under-diagnosed. They commonly arise above the arcuate line. We describe three clinical stages: Stage 1 hernias are those without peritoneal sacs and tend to arise in younger patients, can be difficult to diagnose and may not seen at laparoscopy. Stages 2 and 3 hernias arise in older patients, do have peritoneal sacs, are visible at laparoscopy and are more likely to present as emergencies. Stage three hernias are too large for laparoscopic repair. The differences between stages likely reflect the natural history of the condition, which begins as extraperitoneal fat protrusion and progresses over many years to develop a peritoneal sac.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHernia, VentralHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedAetiologyAnatomyClassification systemHernia repairSpigelian hernia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.