Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28097434›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2017

Work-related infections in dentistry: risk perception and preventive measures.

Tatjana Ramich, Peter Eickholz, Sabine Wicker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Attitudes toward Vaccinations and Vaccination Coverage Rates among Dental Students in Greece.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Occupational Infections among Dental Health Workers in Germany-14-Year Time Trends.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Infections in Healthcare Workers in Germany-22-Year Time Trends.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tatjana RamichDepartment of Periodontology, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (ZZMK [Carolinum]), Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7 (Haus 29), 60596, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Peter EickholzDepartment of Periodontology, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (ZZMK [Carolinum]), Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7 (Haus 29), 60596, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. eickholz@med.uni-frankfurt.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1655-8055
Sabine WickerOccupational Health Service, University Hospital Frankfurt, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEvaluation of (1) the risk perception of work-related infections in dentistry, (2) the vaccination status, (3) knowledge of the blood-borne pathogens and HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) as well as (4) use of personal protective equipment (PPE) (gloves, goggles, mask) among the staff and students of the Center of Dentistry and Oral Medicine (ZZMK [Carolinum]) of the Goethe University Frankfurt/Main. MATERIAL AND

methodsAll staff (dentists, dental assistants) and students of the ZZMK with direct contact to patients were asked to anonymously complete a questionnaire. The results of this survey were compared with respect to gender, age and occupational group.

resultsOf 178 employees working and 234 students studying at the ZZMK with direct contact to patients, 108 (61%) and 167 (71%) participated (1 person did not reveal his/her status). Thirty-three per cent of the participants assessed the risk of transmission of blood-borne diseases in dental practice as high. Whereas 94% of the participants were fully vaccinated against hepatitis B, only 21% knew their anti-HBs titer. Fifty per cent of students, 13% of dentists and 45% of the assistants did not know the standardised procedure of HIV-PEP. Ninety-four per cent of the study participants always wore protective gloves, 87% always wore a surgical mask and 67% always wore protective goggles.

conclusionsThe fear of HIV is still the largest, followed by hepatitis C. The participants assessed the risk of transmission in spite of all protective measures from the patient to the dentist significantly higher than the transmission from the dentist to the patient. The use of protective measures, especially goggles, requires further optimizing. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In general, the use of protective measures, especially goggles, requires further optimizing.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultCross InfectionCross-Sectional StudiesDental StaffFearFemaleGermanyHumansMaleOccupational DiseasesSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationDental studentsHealthcare workerOccupational infectionsVaccination

Identifiers

PMID28097434
OpenAlexW2578239499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.