[Use of dual mobility cups for revision hip arthroplasty].

E Röhner, G Matziolis

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

2citing papers in PubMed

0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

Unstable Total Hip Arthroplasty: Should It Be Revised Using Dual Mobility Implants? A Retrospective Analysis from the R.I.P.O. Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
Article
[Revision total hip arthroplasty : Significance of instability, impingement, offset and gluteal insufficiency].Der Orthopade · 2019
Review

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E RöhnerOrthopädische Klinik des Universitätsklinikums Jena am Campus Eisenberg, Waldkrankenhaus "Rudolf Elle" GmbH, Klosterlausnitzer Straße 81, 07607, Eisenberg, Deutschland. e.roehner@krankenhaus-eisenberg.de.

G MatziolisOrthopädische Klinik des Universitätsklinikums Jena am Campus Eisenberg, Waldkrankenhaus "Rudolf Elle" GmbH, Klosterlausnitzer Straße 81, 07607, Eisenberg, Deutschland.

Waldkrankenhaus Rudolf Elle · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dual mobility cup (DMC) is an increasingly important tool not only in primary but also in revision total hip arthroplasty to prevent dislocation and eventually reduce postoperative complication rates. Various studies have shown survival rates with DMCs of up to 100% with an average dislocation rate of less than 1.5% after primary hip arthroplasty and a follow-up of 10 years. In revision surgery, survival rates of up to 99% were reported with dislocation rates between 0 and 10% after an average of 5 years after implantation. This article is intended to provide an overview of the principle and function of DMCs. Furthermore, indications as well as complications are presented.

Indexed as

AcetabuloplastyAcetabulumArthroplasty, Replacement, HipCombined Modality TherapyEquipment Failure AnalysisEvidence-Based MedicineHip DislocationHumansOsteotomyPlastic Surgery ProceduresProsthesis DesignReoperationTreatment OutcomeComplication, postoperativeHip displacementRevision surgeryTotal hip replacementTrochanter

Identifiers

PMID28097416

DOI10.1007/s00132-016-3383-1

OpenAlexW2582975953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.