Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28097317›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2017

Surrogate End Points for All-Cause Mortality in Men With Localized Unfavorable-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Radiation Therapy vs Radiation Therapy Plus Androgen Deprivation Therapy: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Trevor J Royce, Ming-Hui Chen, Jing Wu, Marian Loffredo, Andrew A Renshaw, Philip W Kantoff, Anthony V D'Amico

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00116220 (A Phase III Trial of External Beam of Radiotherapy +/- Total Androgen Suppression for High Risk Clinically Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00116220 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III Trial of External Beam of Radiotherapy +/- Total Androgen Suppression for High Risk Clinically Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorDana-Farber Cancer InstituteRan1995 to 2015Enrolled206ConditionsProstate CancerArmsFlutamide (Eulexin) and Lupron or Zoladex, External Beam Radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Time Interval to Biochemical Failure as a Surrogate End Point in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: Analysis of Randomized Trial NRG/RTOG 9202.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Biochemical Failure Is Not a Surrogate End Point for Overall Survival in Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Analysis of NRG Oncology/RTOG 9601.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Early biochemical predictors of survival in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer treated with radiation and androgen deprivation therapy.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Trevor J RoyceHarvard Radiation Oncology Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts2Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts3Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ming-Hui ChenDepartment of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
Jing WuDepartment of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
Marian LoffredoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts3Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Andrew A RenshawDepartment of Pathology, Baptist Hospital, Miami, Florida.
Philip W KantoffDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, New York.
Anthony V D'AmicoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts3Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
University of Connecticut · USBaptist Hospital of Miami · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceSeveral surrogates for prostate cancer-specific mortality satisfying the Prentice criteria exist, but whether these are surrogates for all-cause mortality, and how their performance compares, is unknown.

objectiveTo ascertain and compare the performance of 4 candidate surrogates (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] failure, PSA nadir >0.5 ng/mL, PSA doubling time <9 months, and interval to PSA failure <30 months) for all-cause mortality using the proportion of treatment-effect metric. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsFor this randomized clinical trial, 206 men with unfavorable-risk prostate cancer who were seen at a Harvard-affiliated academic hospital or an associated community hospital between December 1, 1995, to April 15, 2001, were identified, randomized to radiation therapy alone or radiation therapy followed by 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy, and followed for a median 16.62 years. This analysis looks at the subgroup of 157 men with minimal comorbidities or no comorbidity (median follow-up, 16.49 months).

interventionsPatients were previously randomized to receive radiation therapy or radiation and 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Risk of all-cause mortality.

resultsOverall, a cohort of 157 men (median [interquartile range] age, 72.43 [68.75-75.53]) with unfavorable-risk prostate cancer and minimal or no comorbidities were selected for this study. Three tested metrics met all 4 Prentice criteria for surrogacy for the surrogate covariate in the adjusted model for all-cause mortality: PSA nadir greater than 0.5 ng/mL (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.72; 95% CI, 1.17-2.52; P = .01), PSA doubling time less than 9 months (aHR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.29-3.28; P = .003), and interval to PSA failure less than 30 months (aHR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.06-2.92; P = .03); while PSA failure did not. For the 3 successful surrogates, the proportion of treatment effect values were 103.86%, 43.09%, and 41.26%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A PSA nadir value of greater than 0.5 ng/mL following radiation and androgen deprivation therapy appears to identify men prior to PSA failure who are at high-risk for death. This could be used to select men for entry at the time of PSA nadir onto randomized trials evaluating the impact on survival of salvage androgen deprivation therapy with or without agents shown to prolong survival in men with castrate-resistant metastatic prostate cancer.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00116220.

Indexed as

AgedAndrogen AntagonistsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkersChemotherapy, AdjuvantFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNeoplasm GradingPrognosisProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsUnited StatesAndrogen AntagonistsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkersProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID28097317
PMCPMC5470391
OpenAlexW2574050600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.