Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28097267›Full record

ArticleInvestigative and clinical urology2017

Incidence and risk factors of recurrence of overactive bladder symptoms after discontinuation of successful medical treatment.

Aram Kim, Kyu-Sung Lee, Tae Beom Kim, Hyung Joon Kim, Eun Sang Yoo, Jong-Hyun Yun, Duk Yoon Kim, Suk Gun Jung, Jun Taik Lee, Jung Man Kim and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative and clinical urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. How long do we have to treat overactive bladder syndrome (OAB)? A questionnaire survey of Canadian urologists and gynecologists.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2018
    Article
  3. [Overactive bladder-which treatment when?]Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Aram KimDepartment of Urology, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyu-Sung LeeDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Tae Beom KimDepartment of Urology, Gil Medicine Center, Gachon University of Medicine and Science, Incheon, Korea.
Hyung Joon KimDepartment of Urology, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
Eun Sang YooDepartment of Urology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
Jong-Hyun YunDepartment of Urology, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine, Gumi, Korea.
Duk Yoon KimDepartment of Urology, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Suk Gun JungDepartment of Urology, Daedong Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Jun Taik LeeDepartment of Urology, Busan Saint Mary's Medical Center, Busan, Korea.
Jung Man KimDepartment of Urology, Busan Saint Mary's Medical Center, Busan, Korea.
Cheol Kyu OhDepartment of Urology, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Ju Hyun ShinDepartment of Urology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
Seung Hyun JeonDepartment of Urology, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seong Ho LeeDepartment of Urology, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University School of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea.
Chang Hee HanDepartment of Urology, The Catholic University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Dong Hwan LeeDepartment of Urology, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Hyuk Jin ChoDepartment of Urology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Myung-Soo ChooDepartment of Urology, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify incidence and risk factors of recurrence after discontinuation of successful antimuscarinic therapy in patients with overactive bladder (OAB). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a prospective, multicenter trial. Patients who had antimuscarinic agents for more than 12 weeks and showed successful response were enrolled. Successful response was defined as answering 'benefit' for patient perception of treatment benefit and answer lesser than 3 points in patient's perception of bladder condition (PPBC). The enrolled patients discontinued the antimuscarinics, and we evaluated their recurrence with PPBC and OAB symptom score (OABSS) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Primary purpose was to identify the recurrence rate and secondary purpose was to reveal risk factors.

resultsFour hundred forty-one patients enrolled and 371 patients completed 6-month follow-up. The enrolled patients showed 1.6 points in PPBC, 2.9 points in OABSS and 1.4 points in IPSS (quality of life) which represented successful response after using antimuscarinics. The cumulative rates of recurrence were 25.6%, 42.3%, and 52.2% at 1, 3, 6 months, respectively. Among 177 patients who did not show recurrence at 6 months, 41 patients were followed up and 4 patients of the 41 patients (9.7%) showed recurrence at 12 months. On univariate and multivariate analyses of recurrence, OAB wet was the risk factor for recurrence after 6 months of discontinuation.

conclusionsDiscontinuation of antimuscarinic therapy after successful treatment resulted in high recurrence rate with time and OAB wet was the independent risk factor for recurrence.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscarinic AntagonistsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRecurrenceRisk FactorsSymptom AssessmentUrinary Bladder, OveractiveWithholding TreatmentMuscarinic AntagonistsAntimuscarinic treatmentOveractive bladderRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID28097267
PMCPMC5240281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.