Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28097210›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2017

Preclinical positron emission tomography scanner based on a monolithic annulus of scintillator: initial design study.

Alexander V Stolin, Peter F Martone, Gangadhar Jaliparthi, Raymond R Raylman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Experimental validation of a rodent PET scanner prototype based on a single LYSO crystal tube.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Calibration Methodology of an Edgeless PET System Prototype.IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium conference record. Nuclear Science Symposium
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander V StolinWest Virginia University , Center for Advanced Imaging, Department of Radiology, One Medical Center Dr., Box 9236, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States.
Peter F MartoneWest Virginia University , Center for Advanced Imaging, Department of Radiology, One Medical Center Dr., Box 9236, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States.
Gangadhar JaliparthiWest Virginia University , Center for Advanced Imaging, Department of Radiology, One Medical Center Dr., Box 9236, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States.
Raymond R RaylmanWest Virginia University , Center for Advanced Imaging, Department of Radiology, One Medical Center Dr., Box 9236, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States.

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Sally Lynn Hodder · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
Development of a PEM-PET-CT Breast Imaging and Biopsy DeviceR01CA094196 · NCI · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI RAYLMAN, RAYMOND ROBERT · 2003 to 2013
$3.7M
Development of a Combined MRI-PET System for Contemporaneous Functional ImagingR01EB007349 · NIBIB · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI RAYLMAN, RAYMOND ROBERT · 2009 to 2012
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA094196NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB007349NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) scanners designed for imaging of small animals have transformed translational research by reducing the necessity to invasively monitor physiology and disease progression. Virtually all of these scanners are based on the use of pixelated detector modules arranged in rings. This design, while generally successful, has some limitations. Specifically, use of discrete detector modules to construct PET scanners reduces detection sensitivity and can introduce artifacts in reconstructed images, requiring the use of correction methods. To address these challenges, and facilitate measurement of photon depth-of-interaction in the detector, we investigated a small animal PET scanner (called AnnPET) based on a monolithic annulus of scintillator. The scanner was created by placing 12 flat facets around the outer surface of the scintillator to accommodate placement of silicon photomultiplier arrays. Its performance characteristics were explored using Monte Carlo simulations and sections of the NEMA NU4-2008 protocol. Results from this study revealed that AnnPET's reconstructed spatial resolution is predicted to be [Formula: see text] full width at half maximum in the radial, tangential, and axial directions. Peak detection sensitivity is predicted to be 10.1%. Images of simulated phantoms (mini-hot rod and mouse whole body) yielded promising results, indicating the potential of this system for enhancing PET imaging of small animals.

Indexed as

Monte Carlo simulationpositron emission tomographypreclinicalscanner design

Identifiers

PMID28097210
PMCPMC5217083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.