Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28097123›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of genomics2016

The Power of CRISPR-Cas9-Induced Genome Editing to Speed Up Plant Breeding.

Hieu X Cao, Wenqin Wang, Hien T T Le, Giang T H Vu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Tools and Techniques to Accelerate Crop Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  2. Comparison of single-trait and multi-trait genomic predictions on agronomic and disease resistance traits in spring wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Mutation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  9. Efficient Genome Editing Using CRISPR/Cas9 Technology in Chicory.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hieu X CaoLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Corrensstrasse 3, Gatersleben, 06466 Stadt Seeland, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1230-4127
Wenqin WangSchool of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiaotong University, 800 Dong Chuan Road, Shanghai 200240, China.
Hien T T LeInstitute of Genome Research, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet Road, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Giang T H VuLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Corrensstrasse 3, Gatersleben, 06466 Stadt Seeland, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8394-9067

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing with engineered nucleases enabling site-directed sequence modifications bears a great potential for advanced plant breeding and crop protection. Remarkably, the RNA-guided endonuclease technology (RGEN) based on the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) is an extremely powerful and easy tool that revolutionizes both basic research and plant breeding. Here, we review the major technical advances and recent applications of the CRISPR-Cas9 system for manipulation of model and crop plant genomes. We also discuss the future prospects of this technology in molecular plant breeding.

Identifiers

PMID28097123
PMCPMC5206445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.