Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28097078›Full record

ReviewCureus2016

The Human Central Canal of the Spinal Cord: A Comprehensive Review of its Anatomy, Embryology, Molecular Development, Variants, and Pathology.

Erfanul Saker, Brandon M Henry, Krzysztof A Tomaszewski, Marios Loukas, Joe Iwanaga, Rod J Oskouian, R Shane Tubbs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Purinergic Receptor P2Y2 Regulates Neurogenesis and Functional Recovery Following Spinal Cord Injury in Zebrafish.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Spinal cord morphology and PKD2L1Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Persistence of FoxJ1Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erfanul SakerDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University School of Medicine, Grenada, West Indies.
Brandon M HenryDepartment of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Krzysztof A TomaszewskiDepartment of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Marios LoukasDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University School of Medicine, Grenada, West Indies.
Joe IwanagaSeattle Science Foundation.
Rod J OskouianNeurosurgery, Complex Spine, Swedish Neuroscience Institute.
R Shane TubbsNeurosurgery, Seattle Science Foundation.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human central canal of the spinal cord is often overlooked. However, with advancements in imaging quality, this structure can be visualized in more detail than ever before. Therefore, a timely review of this part of the cord seemed warranted. Using standard search engines, a literature review was performed for the development, anatomy, and pathology involving the central canal. Clinicians who treat patients with issues near the spine or interpret imaging of the spinal cord should be familiar with the morphology and variants of the central canal.

Indexed as

anatomycentral canalspinal cordspinesyringomyelia

Identifiers

PMID28097078
PMCPMC5234862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.