Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28097073›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2017

Handling stress may confound murine gut microbiota studies.

Cary R Allen-Blevins, Xiaomeng You, Katie Hinde, David A Sela

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. BiombalanceAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Colonization byFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cary R Allen-BlevinsDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University , Cambridge , MA , United States.
Xiaomeng YouDepartment of Food Science, University of Massachusetts , Amherst , MA , United States.
Katie HindeCenter for Evolution and Medicine, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States; School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
David A SelaDepartment of Food Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States; Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States; Center for Microbiome Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
University of Massachusetts Amherst · USArizona State University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccumulating evidence indicates interactions between human milk composition, particularly sugars (human milk oligosaccharides or HMO), the gut microbiota of human infants, and behavioral effects. Some HMO secreted in human milk are unable to be endogenously digested by the human infant but are able to be metabolized by certain species of gut microbiota, including

methodsThis study was designed to test two methods, active and passive, of solution administration to mice and the effects on their gut microbiome. Neonatal C57BL/6J mice housed in a specific-pathogen free facility received increasing doses of fructooligosaccharide (FOS) solution or deionized, distilled water. Gastrointestinal (GI) tracts were collected from five dams, six sires, and 41 pups over four time points. Seven fecal pellets from unhandled pups and two pellets from unhandled dams were also collected. Qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to quantify and compare the amount of

resultsOur results demonstrate a significant difference between the amount of Firmicutes in pups receiving water passively and those receiving FOS actively ( DISCUSSION: From our results, we conclude even handling pups for experimental purposes, without gavage, may induce enough stress to alter the murine gut microbiota profile. We suggest further studies to examine potential stress effects on gut microbiota caused by experimental techniques. Stress from experimental techniques may need to be accounted for in future gut microbiota studies.

Indexed as

BifidobacteriaMethodsMicrobiotaMilk oligosaccharidesMouse study

Identifiers

PMID28097073
PMCPMC5234434
OpenAlexW2576690840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.