Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28096902›Full record

ArticleMobile DNA2017

Functional characterization of the active

Kun Liu, Susan R Wessler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mobile DNA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Divergent Evolutionary Profile ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Independent evolution of transposase and TIRs facilitated by recombination betweenProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Cloning of MaizeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Evolution ofMobile DNA · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kun LiuGraduate Program in Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 USA.
Susan R WesslerDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 USA.
University of California, Riverside · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

resultsHere we report the identification of potentially active MULEs in the mosquito

conclusionsCollectively, our data indicates that the

Indexed as

Aedes aegyptiMutator-like elements (MULE)Target site duplication (TSD)Transposable elementsTransposaseYeast assay

Identifiers

PMID28096902
PMCPMC5225508
OpenAlexW2575754451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.