Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28096715›Full record

ReviewKorean journal of radiology

Radiology Consultation in the Era of Precision Oncology: A Review of Consultation Models and Services in the Tertiary Setting.

Pamela J DiPiro, Katherine M Krajewski, Angela A Giardino, Marta Braschi-Amirfarzan, Nikhil H Ramaiya

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Korean journal of radiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Global Challenges for Cancer Imaging.Journal of global oncology · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pamela J DiPiroDepartment of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Katherine M KrajewskiDepartment of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Angela A GiardinoDepartment of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Marta Braschi-AmirfarzanDepartment of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Nikhil H RamaiyaDepartment of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to describe the various radiology consultation models in the Era of Precision Medicine. Since the inception of our specialty, radiologists have served as consultants to physicians of various disciplines. A variety of radiology consultation services have been described in the literature, including clinical decision support, patient-centric, subspecialty interpretation, and/or some combination of these. In oncology care in particular, case complexity often merits open dialogue with clinical providers. To explore the utility and impact of radiology consultation services in the academic setting, this article will further describe existing consultation models and the circumstances that precipitated their development. The hybrid model successful at our tertiary cancer center is discussed. In addition, the contributions of a consultant radiologist in breast cancer care are reviewed as the archetype of radiology consultation services provided to oncology practitioners.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansInterprofessional RelationsOncology Service, HospitalPatient-Centered CarePrecision MedicineRadiologyReferral and ConsultationTertiary Health CareTomography, X-Ray ComputedPrecision medicineRadiology consultationRadiology servicesTertiary cancer center

Identifiers

PMID28096715
PMCPMC5240488
OpenAlexW2551138669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.