ArticleCancer informatics2017
Identification of Genetic and Epigenetic Variants Associated with Breast Cancer Prognosis by Integrative Bioinformatics Analysis.
Article in Cancer informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expression Levels of DNMT1, HDAC1, and MT1E Genes as Diagnostic Biomarkers for Breast Cancer Clinicopathological Features: In Vitro and In Silico Analyses.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2026Article
- Hypomethylation at H19DMR in penile squamous cell carcinoma is not related to HPV infection.Epigenetics · 2024Article
- Involvement of CCCTC-binding factor in epigenetic regulation of cancer.Molecular biology reports · 2023Review
- Susceptibility to hypertension based onFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Interaction between a diabetes-related methylation site (TXNIP cg19693031) and variant (GLUT1 rs841853) on fasting blood glucose levels among non-diabetics.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Deciphering the genetic code of DNA methylation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- The Clinical and Pathological Profile of BRCA1 Gene Methylated Breast Cancer Women: A Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2021Review
- Determination of Genetic and Epigenetic Modifications-Related Prognostic Biomarkers of Breast Cancer: Genome High-Throughput Data Analysis.Journal of oncology · 2021Article
- Gene-methylation interactions: discovering region-wise DNA methylation levels that modify SNP-associated disease risk.Clinical epigenetics · 2020Article
- A Comprehensive Risk Assessment Model for Ovarian Cancer Patients withOncoTargets and therapy · 2020Article
- Deconvolution of the Genomic and Epigenomic Interaction Landscape of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2019Article
- Convergence of evidence from a methylome-wide CpG-SNP association study and GWAS of major depressive disorder.Translational psychiatry · 2018Article
- Combining Pathway Identification and Breast Cancer Survival Prediction via Screening-Network Methods.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Article
- Combining DNA methylation and RNA sequencing data of cancer for supervised knowledge extraction.BioData mining · 2018Article
- Prognostic value of routine laboratory variables in prediction of breast cancer recurrence.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBreast cancer being a multifaceted disease constitutes a wide spectrum of histological and molecular variability in tumors. However, the task for the identification of these variances is complicated by the interplay between inherited genetic and epigenetic aberrations. Therefore, this study provides an extrapolate outlook to the sinister partnership between DNA methylation and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in relevance to the identification of prognostic markers in breast cancer. The effect of these SNPs on methylation is defined as methylation quantitative trait loci (meQTL). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe developed a novel method to identify prognostic gene signatures for breast cancer by integrating genomic and epigenomic data. This is based on the hypothesis that multiple sources of evidence pointing to the same gene or pathway are likely to lead to reduced false positives. We also apply random resampling to reduce overfitting noise by dividing samples into training and testing data sets. Specifically, the common samples between Illumina 450 DNA methylation, Affymetrix SNP array, and clinical data sets obtained from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA) were randomly divided into training and test models. An intensive statistical analysis based on log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model has established a significant association between differential methylation and the stratification of breast cancer patients into high- and low-risk groups, respectively.
resultsThe comprehensive assessment based on the conjoint effect of CpG-SNP pair has guided in delaminating the breast cancer patients into the high- and low-risk groups. In particular, the most significant association was found with respect to cg05370838-rs2230576, cg00956490-rs940453, and cg11340537-rs2640785 CpG-SNP pairs. These CpG-SNP pairs were strongly associated with differential expression of
conclusionsThus, the analysis based on DNA methylation and SNPs have resulted in the identification of novel susceptible loci that hold prognostic relevance in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.