Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28096493›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2017

Combining standard clinical blood values for improving survival prediction in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases-development and validation of the LabBM score.

Anna S Berghoff, Fabian Wolpert, Tim Holland-Letz, Romina Koller, Georg Widhalm, Brigitte Gatterbauer, Karin Dieckmann, Peter Birner, Rupert Bartsch, Christoph C Zielinski and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The LabBM score is an excellent survival prediction tool in patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna S BerghoffDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Biostatistics Division, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Fabian WolpertDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Biostatistics Division, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Tim Holland-LetzDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Biostatistics Division, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Romina KollerDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Biostatistics Division, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Georg WidhalmDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Biostatistics Division, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Brigitte GatterbauerDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Biostatistics Division, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Karin DieckmannDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Biostatistics Division, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Peter BirnerDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Biostatistics Division, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Rupert BartschDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Biostatistics Division, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph C ZielinskiDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Biostatistics Division, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael WellerDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Biostatistics Division, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Matthias PreusserDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Biostatistics Division, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
University of Zurich · CHComprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to investigate the potential of standard hematologic and serum biochemical parameters to provide an independent and substantial contribution to the prediction of survival in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases (BM).

methodsHemoglobin, white blood cell count, platelet count, serum albumin, creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were assessed at diagnosis of BM in a discovery cohort of 1200 cancer patients. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to derive the LabBM score. The LabBM score was externally validated in an independent cohort consisting of 366 patients.

resultsHemoglobin below lower limit of normal (<LLN; hazard ratio [HR] 1.28; P = .001), platelet count <LLN (HR: 1.36; P = .013), albumin <LLN (HR: 1.19; P = .038), LDH above upper limit of normal (>ULN; HR: 1.51; P < .001), and CRP >ULN (HR: 1.52; P < .001) were associated with survival in a multivariable Cox regression model and were included in the calculation of the LabBM score. Multivariable analysis including the LabBM score and graded prognostic assessment class revealed an independent and significant association of the LabBM score with overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.29-1.57; P < .001). The strong and independent association of LabBM score (HR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.54-2.42) with OS prognosis was confirmed in the validation cohort.

conclusionStandard clinical blood parameters, combined in the easy-to-calculate LabBM score, provide strong and independent prognostic information in patients with BM. The LabBM score is an objective, inexpensive, and reproducible tool to plan clinical management strategies in BM patients and to improve patient selection and stratification for clinical trials.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsYoung AdultBiomarkers, Tumoralbuminbrain metastasesCRPhemoglobinlaboratory parameterslactate dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID28096493
PMCPMC5570252
OpenAlexW2577969279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.