Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28096285›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2017

Epoprostenol and pulmonary arterial hypertension: 20 years of clinical experience.

Olivier Sitbon, Anton Vonk Noordegraaf

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07424378 (Randomized Controlled Trial of Epoprostenol Versus Placebo in Addition to Standard Therapy for Severe Frostbite Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07424378 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial of Epoprostenol Versus Placebo in Addition to Standard Therapy for Severe Frostbite Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2026 to 2028Enrolled66ConditionsFrostbiteArmsStandard of care plus Epoprostenol infusion for 8 hours (hrs) per day up to 5 days maximum, Standard of Care + Placebo (Normal Saline)infusion for 8 hours per day up to 5 days maximum
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prostacyclin for pulmonary arterial hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Synthesis of Protocols for Frostbite Care From the FROST Study Sites.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2026
    Observational
  6. Review
  7. Effects ofThe Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Antiplatelet strategies: past, present, and future.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olivier SitbonUniversite Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Anton Vonk NoordegraafDept of Pulmonology, Vrje Universiteit Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epoprostenol was the first therapy to be approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In the 20 years since the introduction of this prostacyclin analogue, the outlook for patients with PAH has improved, with survival rates now double those from the era before the development of disease-specific treatments. Today, there are a large amount of data on the clinical role of prostacyclin treatments and a body of evidence attesting the efficacy of epoprostenol in improving exercise capacity, key haemodynamic parameters and PAH symptoms, as well as in reducing mortality. The place of epoprostenol in the therapeutic management of PAH continues to evolve, with the development of new formulations and use in combination with other drug classes. In this review, we provide a historical perspective on the first 20 years of epoprostenol, a therapy that led to evidence-based study of PAH-specific treatments and the subsequent expansion of treatment options for PAH.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsArterial PressureDrug CompoundingDrug Therapy, CombinationEpoprostenolExercise ToleranceHumansHypertension, PulmonaryPulmonary ArteryRecovery of FunctionTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVasodilator AgentsAntihypertensive AgentsEpoprostenolVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID28096285
PMCPMC9489058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.