Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28096143›Full record

ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2017

Methodological Challenges in Studies Examining the Effects of Breakfast on Cognitive Performance and Appetite in Children and Adolescents.

Katie Adolphus, Nick Bellissimo, Clare L Lawton, Nikki A Ford, Tia M Rains, Julia Totosy de Zepetnek, Louise Dye

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Katie AdolphusHuman Appetite Research Unit, School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0655-1025
Nick BellissimoFaculty of Community Services, School of Nutrition, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada.
Clare L LawtonHuman Appetite Research Unit, School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2341-0793
Nikki A FordHass Avocado Board, Mission Viejo, CA; and.
Tia M RainsEgg Nutrition Center, Park Ridge, IL.
Julia Totosy de ZepetnekFaculty of Community Services, School of Nutrition, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7011-5143
Louise DyeHuman Appetite Research Unit, School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; l.dye@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2331-4227
University of Leeds · GBToronto Metropolitan University · CAMission Heritage Medical Group · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breakfast is purported to confer a number of benefits on diet quality, health, appetite regulation, and cognitive performance. However, new evidence has challenged the long-held belief that breakfast is the most important meal of the day. This review aims to provide a comprehensive discussion of the key methodological challenges and considerations in studies assessing the effect of breakfast on cognitive performance and appetite control, along with recommendations for future research. This review focuses on the myriad challenges involved in studying children and adolescents specifically. Key methodological challenges and considerations include study design and location, sampling and sample section, choice of objective cognitive tests, choice of objective and subjective appetite measures, merits of providing a fixed breakfast compared with ad libitum, assessment and definition of habitual breakfast consumption, transparency of treatment condition, difficulty of isolating the direct effects of breakfast consumption, untangling acute and chronic effects, and influence of confounding variables. These methodological challenges have hampered a clear substantiation of the potential positive effects of breakfast on cognition and appetite control and contributed to the debate questioning the notion that breakfast is the most important meal of the day.

Indexed as

Adolescent HealthAppetiteBreakfastChild HealthCognitionDietResearch DesignAdolescentAppetite RegulationChildHumansappetitebreakfastcognitive performancemethodological considerationsmethods

Identifiers

PMID28096143
PMCPMC5227972
OpenAlexW2576999634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.