Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28095924›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

SONOlysis in prevention of Brain InfaRctions During Internal carotid Endarterectomy (SONOBIRDIE) trial - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Tomáš Hrbáč, David Netuka, Vladimír Beneš, Vladimír Nosáľ, Petra Kešnerová, Aleš Tomek, Táňa Fadrná, Vladimír Beneš, Jiří Fiedler, Vladimír Přibáň and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02398734 (Risk Reduction of Symptomatic and Silent Brain Infarctions During Carotid Endarterectomy by the Ultrasound Activation of Endogenous Fibrinolytic System Using Sonolysis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02398734 nacompletednot on this map

Risk Reduction of Symptomatic and Silent Brain Infarctions During Carotid Endarterectomy by the Ultrasound Activation of Endogenous Fibrinolytic System Using Sonolysis (Transcranial Doppler Monitoring)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital OstravaRan2015 to 2022Enrolled1,492ConditionsInternal Carotid Artery StenosisArmssonolysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Tomáš HrbáčDepartment of Neurosurgery, Comprehensive Stroke Center, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
David NetukaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vladimír BenešDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vladimír NosáľDepartment of Neurology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Petra KešnerováDepartment of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Aleš TomekDepartment of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Táňa FadrnáDepartment of Neurosurgery, Comprehensive Stroke Center, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Vladimír BenešDepartment of Neurosurgery, Comprehensive Stroke Center, Liberec Hospital, Liberec, Czech Republic.
Jiří FiedlerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Comprehensive Stroke Center, České Budějovice Hospital, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Vladimír PřibáňDepartment of Neurosurgery, Comprehensive Stroke Center, University Hospital Plzeň, Plzeň, Czech Republic.
Miroslav BrozmanDepartment of Neurology, Faculty Hospital Nitra, Constantine Philosopher University Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia.
Kateřina LangováCenter for Research and Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Roman HerzigDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
David ŠkoloudíkCenter for Research and Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic. skoloudik@hotmail.com.
Military University Hospital Prague · CZPalacký University Olomouc · CZCharles University · CZUniversity Hospital Plzen · CZComenius University Bratislava · SKConstantine the Philosopher University in Nitra · SKUniversity Hospital Hradec Králové · CZUniversity Hospital Ostrava · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a beneficial procedure for selected patients with an internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. Surgical risk of CEA varies from between 2 and 15%. The aim of the study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of sonolysis (continual transcranial Doppler monitoring, TCD) using a 2-MHz diagnostic probe with maximal diagnostic energy on the reduction of the incidence of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA) and brain infarction detected using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by the activation of the endogenous fibrinolytic system during CEA. METHODS/

designDesign: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. SCOPE: international, multicenter trial for patients with at least 70% symptomatic or asymptomatic ICA stenosis undergoing CEA. INCLUSION CRITERIA: patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic ICA stenosis of at least 70% are candidates for CEA; a sufficient temporal bone window for TCD; aged 40-85 years, functionally independent; provision of signed informed consent. Randomization: consecutive patients will be assigned to the sonolysis or control (sham procedure) group by computer-generated 1:1 randomization. Prestudy calculations showed that a minimum of 704 patients in each group is needed to reach a significant difference with an alpha value of 0.05 (two-tailed) and a beta value of 0.8 assuming that 10% would be lost to follow-up or refuse to participate in the study (estimated 39 endpoints). ENDPOINTS: the primary endpoint is the incidence of stroke or TIA during 30 days after CEA and the incidence of new ischemic lesions on brain MRI performed 24 h after CEA in the sonolysis and control groups. Secondary endpoints are occurrence of death, any stroke, or myocardial infarction within 30 days, changes in cognitive functions 1 year post procedure related to pretreatment scores, and number of new lesions and occurrence of new lesions ≥0.5 mL on post-procedural brain MRI. ANALYSIS: descriptive statistics and linear/logistic multiple regression models will be performed. Clinical relevance will be measured as relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction and the number needed to treat. DISCUSSION: Reduction of the periprocedural complications of CEA using sonolysis as a widely available and cheap method may significantly increase the safety of CEA and extend the indication criteria for CEA.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02398734 . Registered on 20 March 2015.

Indexed as

Endarterectomy, CarotidFibrinolysisUltrasonography, Doppler, TranscranialAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarotid Artery, InternalCarotid StenosisCerebral InfarctionClinical ProtocolsCzech RepublicDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleBrain infarctionCarotidEndarterectomySonolysisStroke

Identifiers

PMID28095924
PMCPMC5240392
OpenAlexW2576718117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.