Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28095907›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2017

The Targeted SMAC Mimetic SW IV-134 is a strong enhancer of standard chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer.

Yassar M Hashim, Suwanna Vangveravong, Narendra V Sankpal, Pratibha S Binder, Jingxia Liu, S Peter Goedegebuure, Robert H Mach, Dirk Spitzer, William G Hawkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. BH3-mimetics: recent developments in cancer therapy.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Development of small molecule fluorescent dye drug conjugates in targeted cancer therapy.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yassar M HashimDepartment of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8109, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Suwanna VangveravongDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Narendra V SankpalDepartment of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8109, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Pratibha S BinderDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Jingxia LiuDepartment of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8109, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
S Peter GoedegebuureDepartment of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8109, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Robert H MachDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Dirk SpitzerDepartment of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8109, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3949-1815
William G HawkinsDepartment of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8109, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA. hawkinsw@wudosis.wustl.edu.

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AIMEE S JAMES · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
Washington University DDRCC Supplemental Equipment RequestP30DK052574 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Nicholas O. Davidson · 2000 to 2026
$30.8M
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY TRAINING GRANTT32CA009621 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN, William E. Gillanders · 1988 to 2026
$12.9M
Washington University SPORE in Pancreatic CancerP50CA196510 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HAWKINS, WILLIAM G · 2016 to 2020
$10.9M
SIGMA-2/PEPTIDOMIMETIC CONJUGATES TARGET APOPTOSIS IN PANCREATIC CANCERR01CA163764 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HAWKINS, WILLIAM G, SPITZER, DIRK M. · 2012 to 2021
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS P50 CA196510NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163764NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009621NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK052574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic cancer is a lethal malignancy that frequently acquires resistance to conventional chemotherapies often associated with overexpression of inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs). We have recently described a novel means to deliver second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases (SMAC) mimetics selectively to cancer cells employing the sigma-2 ligand/receptor interaction. The intrinsic death pathway agonist SMAC offers an excellent opportunity to counteract the anti-apoptotic activity of IAPs. SMAC mimetics have been used to sensitize several cancer types to chemotherapeutic agents but cancer-selective delivery and appropriate cellular localization have not yet been considered. In our current study, we tested the ability of the sigma-2/SMAC drug conjugate SW IV-134 to sensitize pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine.

methodsUsing the targeted SMAC mimetic SW IV-134, inhibition of the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (XIAP) was induced pharmacologically and its impact on cell viability was studied alone and in combination with gemcitabine. Pathway analyses were performed by assessing caspase activation, PARP cleavage and membrane blebbing (Annexin-V), key components of apoptotic cell death. Single-agent treatment regimens were compared with combination therapy in a preclinical mouse model of pancreatic cancer.

resultsThe sensitizing effect of XIAP interference toward gemcitabine was confirmed via pharmacological intervention using our recently designed, targeted SMAC mimetic SW IV-134 across a wide range of commonly used pancreatic cancer cell lines at concentrations where the individual drugs showed only minimal activity. On a mechanistic level, we identified involvement of key components of the apoptosis machinery during cell death execution. Furthermore, combination therapy proved superior in decreasing the tumor burden and extending the lives of the animals in a preclinical mouse model of pancreatic cancer.

conclusionWe believe that the strong sensitizing capacity of SW IV-134 in combination with clinically relevant doses of gemcitabine represents a promising treatment option that warrants clinical evaluation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic AgentsAzabicyclo CompoundsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalDeoxycytidineDrug SynergismGemcitabineGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiceOligopeptidesPancreatic NeoplasmsXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic AgentsAzabicyclo CompoundsDeoxycytidineGemcitabineOligopeptidesSW IV-134XIAP protein, humanX-Linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinCombination therapyGemcitabinePancreatic cancerSigma-2 receptorsSigma-2/SMAC drug conjugate

Identifiers

PMID28095907
PMCPMC5240213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.