Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28095898›Full record

ArticleJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale2017

Differences in RANTES and IL-6 levels among chronic rhinosinusitis patients with predominant gram-negative and gram-positive infection.

Almoaidbellah Rammal, Marc Tewfik, Simon Rousseau

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reduced Glycolysis and Cytotoxicity inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Host-pathogen interaction between macrophage co-cultures with Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neutrophils as a Protagonist and Target in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Almoaidbellah RammalDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Marc TewfikMcGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Blvd., Rm D05.5718, Montreal, QC, H4A 3 J1, Canada. marc.tewfik@mcgill.ca.
Simon RousseauDepartments of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
King Abdul Aziz University Hospital · SAMcGill University · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBacteria are suspected players in the pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), yet their exact role is not understood. We investigated the effect of planktonic and biofilm of staphylococcus aureus (SA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) on the mucosa of CRS patients with gram-positive and gram-negative infections by measuring the levels of IL-6 and RANTES, a chemokine with activity on eosinophils and T lymphocytes.

methodsEthmoid mucosa of six CRS patients with gram-positive bacteria on culture and five with gram-negative bacteria were compared to ethmoid mucosa of 8 control patients. The tissue explants were stimulated with SA and PA extracts in planktonic and biofilm form for 6 hours, then RANTES levels were measured by ELISA.

resultsCompared to the control group, CRS patients with gram-negative predominance demonstrated a significantly higher level of RANTES expression in response to all forms of bacterial stimuli (P-value <0.05). Patients with gram-positive predominance showed a higher level of RANTES compere to control group, however, this difference was not significant (P-value >0.05).

conclusionsThe mucosa of CRS patients with gram-negative infections has a heightened innate immune response compared to controls and patients with gram-positive infections. It is possible that this response leads to the pathological eosinophilic inflammation seen in CRS.

Indexed as

AdultCase-Control StudiesChemokine CCL5Chronic DiseaseFemaleHumansInterleukin-6MaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsRhinitisSinusitisStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusCCL5 protein, humanChemokine CCL5Interleukin-6Chronic rhinosinusitisGram negative infectionGram positive infectionIL-6RANTES

Identifiers

PMID28095898
PMCPMC5240439
OpenAlexW2576337199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.