Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28095835›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary and alternative medicine2017

Antimicrobial activity of some plant materials used in Armenian traditional medicine.

Mikayel Ginovyan, Margarit Petrosyan, Armen Trchounian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluating the Efficacy of Polyphenol-Enriched Plant Extracts and Pathway Modulators in the Bone Marrow to Suppress Breast Cancer Progression.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Traditionally Used Medicinal Plants of Armenia.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Effect of Different Physical Factors on efficacy ofBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2022
    Article
  16. The role ofVeterinary world · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mikayel GinovyanDepartment of Microbiology, Plants and Microbes Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, Yerevan State University, 1 Alex Manoogian Str., Yerevan, 0025, Armenia.
Margarit PetrosyanDepartment of Microbiology, Plants and Microbes Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, Yerevan State University, 1 Alex Manoogian Str., Yerevan, 0025, Armenia.
Armen TrchounianDepartment of Microbiology, Plants and Microbes Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, Yerevan State University, 1 Alex Manoogian Str., Yerevan, 0025, Armenia. Trchounian@ysu.am.
Yerevan State University · AM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic resistance has become one of the major problems facing humanity. The need for new antimicrobials has been increased dramatically. Plants are considered as one of the most promising sources for new antimicrobials discovery. Despite relatively small area, Armenia has large diversity of flora with many endemic species. In Armenian folk medicine plant materials have been used to treat various microbial diseases since ancient times. The goal of our research was to evaluate antimicrobial efficiency of different parts of five wild plants species which are commonly used in Armenian traditional medicine.

methodsPlant crude extracts were obtained with maceration technique using five solvents separately: distilled water, methanol, chloroform, acetone, and hexane. Agar well diffusion assay was used for initial evaluation of antimicrobial properties of plant materials against five bacterial and two yeast strains. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of the most active plant parts were determined by broth microdilution method.

resultsCrude extracts of all five tested plants expressed antimicrobial activity against at least four test strains at 500 μg ml

conclusionsThus, antimicrobial activity of some medicinal plants used in Armenian traditional medicine was evaluated. Some of the plants had rather low minimum bacteriostatic/bactericidal concentrations and therefore they have prospective for further more inclusive studies.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsArmeniaBacteriaMedicine, TraditionalPlant ExtractsPlants, MedicinalAnti-Bacterial AgentsPlant ExtractsAcetoneAntibiotic resistanceAntimicrobial activityArmenian folk medicineCrude extractMinimum bactericidal concentrationPlant material

Identifiers

PMID28095835
PMCPMC5240328
OpenAlexW2575650817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.