Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28095825›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2017

No regrets: Young adult patients in psychiatry report positive reactions to biobank participation.

Janet L Cunningham, Manuel Zanzi, Mimmie Willebrand, Lisa Ekselius, Mia Ramklint

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. 'Sick and tired': Patients reported reasons for not participating in clinical psychiatric research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janet L CunninghamDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychiatry, Uppsala University Hospital, Entrance 10, Floor 3B, 751 85,, Uppsala, Sweden. janet.cunningham@neuro.uu.se.
Manuel ZanziDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychiatry, Uppsala University Hospital, Entrance 10, Floor 3B, 751 85,, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mimmie WillebrandDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychiatry, Uppsala University Hospital, Entrance 10, Floor 3B, 751 85,, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lisa EkseliusDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychiatry, Uppsala University Hospital, Entrance 10, Floor 3B, 751 85,, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mia RamklintDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychiatry, Uppsala University Hospital, Entrance 10, Floor 3B, 751 85,, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch in vulnerable individuals must insure voluntariness and minimize negative reactions caused by participation. This study aimed to describe consent and completion rate in young psychiatric patients in relation to study components, degree of disability and to compare response to research participation in patients and controls.

methodsBetween 2012 and 2015, 463 patients with psychiatric disorders between the ages of 18-25 from the Dept. of General Psychiatry at Uppsala University Hospital and 105 controls were recruited to donate data and samples to a biobank. Consent and completion in relation to questionnaires, biological sampling of blood, saliva or feces, were monitored. Both groups were also asked about their perceived disability and how research participation affected them.

resultsMost patients who participated consented to and completed questionnaires and blood sampling. The majority also consented to saliva sampling, while less than half consented to collect feces. Of those who gave consent to saliva and feces only half completed the sampling. Both patients and controls reported high voluntariness and were positive to research participation. Within the patient group, those with greater perceived disability reported greater distress while participating in research, but there was no difference in consent or completion rates or level of regret.

conclusionsWith the described information procedures, psychiatric patients, regardless of perceived disability, reported high voluntariness and did not regret participation in biobanking. Compared to questionnaires and blood sampling, given consent was reduced for feces and completion was lower for both saliva and feces sampling.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksEmotionsPsychiatric Department, HospitalAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInformed ConsentMaleMental DisordersPatient ParticipationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBiobankingDisabilityEthicsGeneral psychiatryVoluntariness

Identifiers

PMID28095825
PMCPMC5240261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.