Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28095647›Full record

ReviewGenesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)2017

New-generation mass spectrometry expands the toolbox of cell and developmental biology.

Camille Lombard-Banek, Erika P Portero, Rosemary M Onjiko, Peter Nemes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Subcellular mass spectrometry reveals proteome remodeling in an asymmetrically dividing (frog) embryonic stem cell.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Proteomic-based approaches to cardiac development and disease.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Metabolic Comparison of DorsalAnalytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in neural circuits · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Camille Lombard-BanekDepartment of Chemistry, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052.
Erika P PorteroDepartment of Chemistry, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052.
Rosemary M OnjikoDepartment of Chemistry, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052.
Peter NemesDepartment of Chemistry, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052.

Funding

In Situ Optoguided Microsampling Single-cell Mass Spectrometry for Elucidating Cell HeterogeneityR21GM114854 · NIGMS · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI NEMES, PETER · 2014 to 2015
$361k
Critical Transition-based Correlation Analysis for MetabolomicsR03CA211635 · NCI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI NEMES, PETER, ZENG, CHEN · 2016 to 2016
$153k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA211635NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM114854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systems cell biology understanding of development requires characterization of all the molecules produced in the biological system. Decades of research and new-generation sequencing provided functional information on key genes and transcripts. However, there is less information available on how differential gene expression translates into the domains of functionally important proteins, peptides, and metabolites, and how changes in these molecules impact development. Mass spectrometry (MS) is the current technology of choice for the detection and quantification of large numbers of proteins and metabolites, because it requires no use of antibodies, functional probes, or a priori knowledge of molecules produced in the system. This review focuses on recent technologies that have improved MS sensitivity for proteins and metabolites and enabled new functionalities to assess their temporal and spatial changes during vertebrate embryonic development. This review highlights case studies, in which new-generation MS tools have enabled the study of hundreds-to-thousands of proteins and metabolites in tissues, cell populations, and single cells in model systems of vertebrate development, particularly the frog (Xenopus), zebrafish, and mouse. New-generation MS expands the toolbox of cell and developmental studies, raising exciting potentials to advance basic and translational research in the life sciences.

Indexed as

AnimalsDevelopmental BiologyGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMass SpectrometryMiceSystems BiologyXenopus laevisZebrafishgenesmass spectrometrymetabolitesproteinssingle cellXenopus

Identifiers

PMID28095647
PMCPMC5276721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.