Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28095623›Full record

ReviewGenesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)2017

Xenopus as a model for studies in mechanical stress and cell division.

Georgina A Stooke-Vaughan, Lance A Davidson, Sarah Woolner

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Methods for Tattooing Xenopus laevis with a Rotary Tattoo Machine.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2024
    Article
  3. Methods for Tattooing Xenopus laevis with a Rotary Tattoo Machine.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2024
    Article
  4. Methods for Tattooing Xenopus laevis with a Rotary Tattoo Machine.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Georgina A Stooke-VaughanWellcome Trust Centre for Cell-Matrix Research, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom.
Lance A DavidsonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213.
Sarah WoolnerWellcome Trust Centre for Cell-Matrix Research, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5680-4030
Wellcome Centre for Cell-Matrix Research · GBUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

The Biomechanics of morphogenesis in the frogR01HD044750 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI DAVIDSON, LANCE A. · 2005 to 2020
$3.8M
Mechanical Control of Mesenchymal-to-Epithelial TransitionR56HL134195 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DAVIDSON, LANCE A. · 2016 to 2016
$550k
NHLBI NIH HHS R56 HL134195NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD044750Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We exist in a physical world, and cells within biological tissues must respond appropriately to both environmental forces and forces generated within the tissue to ensure normal development and homeostasis. Cell division is required for normal tissue growth and maintenance, but both the direction and rate of cell division must be tightly controlled to avoid diseases of over-proliferation such as cancer. Recent studies have shown that mechanical cues can cause mitotic entry and orient the mitotic spindle, suggesting that physical force could play a role in patterning tissue growth. However, to fully understand how mechanics guides cells in vivo, it is necessary to assess the interaction of mechanical strain and cell division in a whole tissue context. In this mini-review we first summarise the body of work linking mechanics and cell division, before looking at the advantages that the Xenopus embryo can offer as a model organism for understanding: (1) the mechanical environment during embryogenesis, and (2) factors important for cell division. Finally, we introduce a novel method for applying a reproducible strain to Xenopus embryonic tissue and assessing subsequent cell divisions.

Indexed as

Stress, MechanicalAnimalsCell DivisionEmbryonic DevelopmentEpithelial CellsMitosisModels, AnimalSpindle ApparatusXenopus laevisbiomechanicsdivision orientationmitosisXenopus laevis

Identifiers

PMID28095623
PMCPMC5276720
OpenAlexW2581839433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.