SynthesisPloS one2017
Health Outcomes of Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 8 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 651 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the SARC-F Score as a Screening Tool for Undernutrition in a Geriatric Population
Elastic-band Resistance Exercise or Vibration Treatment With Hydroxymethylbutyrate (HMB) Supplement for Sarcopenic Older People
Evaluation of a Diagnostic Method: Calf Circumference Versus X-ray Absorptiometry in the Diagnosis of Sarcopenia in Elderly Hospitalized Participants
The Utility of MIndfulness-based Physical Exercise Program (MIPE Program) for Community-dwelling Older People With Sarcopenia: a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial
Respiratory Sarcopenia in Older Adults: Prevalence, Associated Factors and Response to an Exercise Program
Ultrasound-based Morphometry for the Development of Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers in Current and Chronic Diseases
Influence of Sarcopenia on the Course of the Diseases - Measured Using Ultrasound and Biochemical Markers
Effects of Creatine Monohydrate and β-Hydroxy-β-Methylbutyrate Supplementation Combined With Multicomponent Exercise on Physical Performance, Cognition and Quality of Life in Institutionalized Older Adults: A Randomized Double-Blind Parallel-Group Trial
Who cites it
651 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of ACSM protocol-compliant exercise on sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC geriatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Circulating biomarkers in older adults with and without sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Evidence-based position paper on Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) professional practice for persons with sarcopenia. The European PRM position (UEMS PRM Section).European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Safety of Interventions for Sarcopenia in Advanced Prostate Carcinoma: Systematic Review.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026Pooled it
- Exercise and nutritional interventions for sarcopenia-related fall prevention in older adults: An umbrella review.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2026Pooled it
- Does osteosarcopenia synergistically increase risk for incident falls and fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Pooled it
- Associations between the triglyceride‒glucose index and the odds of low muscle mass and sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Pooled it
- How Pragmatic Are Sarcopenia Intervention Studies? A Systematic Review.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026Pooled it
- Factors associated with sarcopenia in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness and dose-response relationship of exercise-based interventions for muscle mass in older women with sarcopenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Association between sarcopenia and atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Association between pain and sarcopenia in middle-aged and older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of Plant Versus Animal Protein on Muscle Mass, Strength, Physical Performance, and Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Nutrition reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Mind-Body Exercise in Older Adults With Sarcopenia and Frailty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Surface Electromyography in Sarcopenia: Muscles Involved, Signal Processing Techniques, Significant Features, and Artificial Intelligence Approaches.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Acute Sarcopenia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Its Incidence and Muscle Parameter Shifts During Hospitalisation.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Pooled it
- Prediction models for sarcopenia risk in dialysis patients: a systematic review and critical appraisal.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Pooled it
- Long-term impact of sarcopenia on functional decline and mortality in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- The impact of nutritional intervention and resistance training on muscle strength and mass in healthy older adults-a comparative analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Sarcopenia interventions in long-term care facilities targeting sedentary behaviour and physical inactivity: A systematic review.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2024Pooled it
591 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review to assess the short-, middle- and long-term consequences of sarcopenia.
methodsProspective studies assessing the consequences of sarcopenia were searched across different electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBM Reviews, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EBM Reviews ACP Journal Club, EBM Reviews DARE and AMED). Only studies that used the definition of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People to diagnose sarcopenia were included. Study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. For outcomes reported by three or more studies, a meta-analysis was performed. The study results are expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI.
resultsOf the 772 references identified through the database search, 17 were included in this systematic review. The number of participants in the included studies ranged from 99 to 6658, and the duration of follow-up varied from 3 months to 9.8 years. Eleven out of 12 studies assessed the impact of sarcopenia on mortality. The results showed a higher rate of mortality among sarcopenic subjects (pooled OR of 3.596 (95% CI 2.96-4.37)). The effect was higher in people aged 79 years or older compared with younger subjects (p = 0.02). Sarcopenia is also associated with functional decline (pooled OR of 6 studies 3.03 (95% CI 1.80-5.12)), a higher rate of falls (2/2 studies found a significant association) and a higher incidence of hospitalizations (1/1 study). The impact of sarcopenia on the incidence of fractures and the length of hospital stay was less clear (only 1/2 studies showed an association for both outcomes).
conclusionSarcopenia is associated with several harmful outcomes, making this geriatric syndrome a real public health burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.