Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28095395›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2017

The burden of occupationally-related cutaneous malignant melanoma in Britain due to solar radiation.

Lesley Rushton, Sally J Hutchings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Outdoor work as risk factor for facial melanoma: UV exposure, risk awareness, and occupational relevance.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Global Burden of Occupational Disease.Current environmental health reports · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lesley RushtonDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK.
Sally J HutchingsDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing evidence highlights the association of occupational exposure and cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM). We estimated the burden of CMM and total skin cancer burden in Britain due to occupational solar radiation exposure.

methodsAttributable fractions (AF) and numbers were estimated for CMM mortality and incidence using risk estimates from the published literature and national data sources for proportions exposed. We extended existing methods to account for the exposed population age structure.

resultsThe estimated total AF for CMM is 2.0% (95% CI: 1.4-2.7%), giving 48 (95% CI: 33-64) deaths in (2012) and 241 (95% CI: 168-325) registrations (in 2011) attributable to occupational exposure to solar radiation. Higher exposure and larger numbers exposed led to much higher numbers for men than women. Industries of concern are construction, agriculture, public administration and defence, and land transport.

conclusionsThese results emphasise the urgent need to develop appropriate strategies to reduce this burden.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureSkin NeoplasmsSunlightUltraviolet RaysUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID28095395
PMCPMC5318974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.