Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28095159›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2017

Validation and Modification of a Prediction Model for Acute Cardiac Events in Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Radiotherapy Based on Three-Dimensional Dose Distributions to Cardiac Substructures.

Veerle A B van den Bogaard, Bastiaan D P Ta, Arjen van der Schaaf, Angelique B Bouma, Astrid M H Middag, Enja J Bantema-Joppe, Lisanne V van Dijk, Femke B J van Dijk-Peters, Laurens A W Marteijn, Gertruida H de Bock and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 254 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
254citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

254 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cardiac substructure dosimetry in thoracic radiotherapy: moving beyond mean heart dose and toward precision cardiac risk mitigation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

194 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Veerle A B van den BogaardAll authors: University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Bastiaan D P TaAll authors: University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Arjen van der SchaafAll authors: University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Angelique B BoumaAll authors: University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Astrid M H MiddagAll authors: University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Enja J Bantema-JoppeAll authors: University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Lisanne V van DijkAll authors: University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Femke B J van Dijk-PetersAll authors: University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Laurens A W MarteijnAll authors: University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Gertruida H de BockAll authors: University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Johannes G M BurgerhofAll authors: University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Jourik A GietemaAll authors: University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Johannes A LangendijkAll authors: University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
John H MaduroAll authors: University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Anne P G CrijnsAll authors: University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose A relationship between mean heart dose (MHD) and acute coronary event (ACE) rate was reported in a study of patients with breast cancer (BC). The main objective of our cohort study was to validate this relationship and investigate if other dose-distribution parameters are better predictors for ACEs than MHD. Patients and Methods The cohort consisted of 910 consecutive female patients with BC treated with radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery. The primary end point was cumulative incidence of ACEs within 9 years of follow-up. Both MHD and various dose-distribution parameters of the cardiac substructures were collected from three-dimensional computed tomography planning data. Results The median MHD was 2.37 Gy (range, 0.51 to 15.25 Gy). The median follow-up time was 7.6 years (range, 0.1 to 10.1 years), during which 30 patients experienced an ACE. The cumulative incidence of ACE increased by 16.5% per Gy (95% CI, 0.6 to 35.0; P = .042). Analysis showed that the volume of the left ventricle receiving 5 Gy (LV-V5) was the most important prognostic dose-volume parameter. The most optimal multivariable normal tissue complication probability model for ACEs consisted of LV-V5, age, and weighted ACE risk score per patient (c-statistic, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.91). Conclusion A significant dose-effect relationship was found for ACEs within 9 years after RT. Using MHD, the relative increase per Gy was similar to that reported in the previous study. In addition, LV-V5 seemed to be a better predictor for ACEs than MHD. This study confirms the importance of reducing exposure of the heart to radiation to avoid excess risk of ACEs after radiotherapy for BC.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeartHeart VentriclesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalIncidenceMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID28095159
PMCPMC5455600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.