Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2017
Effects of β-blockers on all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease.
Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beta-Blockers in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Association between β-blocker use and mortality in critically ill patients: a nested cohort study.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2018Trial
- Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus on β-Blockers.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2017Trial
- Effects of β-blockers on all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2017Trial
- Effect of Beta-Blocker on Long-Term Major Cardiovascular Events in High Atherosclerotic Risk Population.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2024Observational
- Associations betweenCardiology research and practice · 2022Article
- Impact of sitagliptin combination therapy and hypoglycemia in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a multi-center retrospective observational cohort study.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2020Article
- Effect of β-blocker therapy in diabetic patients with stable coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2019Article
- Consensus recommendations for management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2019Review
- Granule of BU-XIN RUAN-MAI Attenuates the Patients' Angina Pectoris of Coronary Heart Disease via Regulating miR-542-3p/GABARAP Signaling.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2019Article
- Beta-blocker use and cardiovascular event risk in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo assess whether the use of beta-blockers influences mortality and the incidence of major cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes and coronary heart disease (CHD). MATERIALS AND
methodsUsing data from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes trial, we performed Cox proportional hazards analysis to assess the effects of β-blockers on all-cause mortality in 2244 patients with type 2 diabetes who had stable CHD with and without a history of myocardial infarction (MI)/heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF).
resultsAll-cause mortality in patients with MI/HFrEF was significantly lower in those receiving β-blockers than in those not receiving β-blockers (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.98; P = .04), whereas that in patients without MI/HFrEF did not significantly differ (adjusted HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76-1.32; P = .64). Among patients with MI/HFrEF, all-cause mortality in those who received intensive medical therapy alone for CHD was significantly lower in those on β-blockers than in those not on β-blockers (adjusted HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.23-0.88; P = .02); however, mortality in patients who received early revascularization for CHD was not significantly lower in those on β-blockers (adjusted HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.40-1.65; P = .57). The risk of major cardiovascular events in patients without MI/HFrEF was not significantly different between those on and those not on β-blocker treatment.
conclusionsIn patients with diabetes and CHD, the use of β-blockers was effective in reducing all-cause mortality in those with MI/HFrEF but not in those without MI/HFrEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.