Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28093936›Full record

ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2017

Biological activities of Rosmarinus officinalis L. (rosemary) extract as analyzed in microorganisms and cells.

Jonatas Rafael de Oliveira, Daiane de Jesus, Leandro Wagner Figueira, Felipe Eduardo de Oliveira, Cristina Pacheco Soares, Samira Estves Afonso Camargo, Antonio Olavo Cardoso Jorge, Luciane Dias de Oliveira

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Prevention and Treatment ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Seasonal Variation in WildMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring the antimicrobial potential ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Deciphering Neuroprotective Effect ofCurrent drug targets · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Recent Advances and Opportunities in the Study ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antibiofilm Potential of Medicinal Plants againstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonatas Rafael de Oliveira1 Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Univ Estadual Paulista/UNESP, São José dos Campos, SP, CEP 12245-000, Brazil.
Daiane de Jesus1 Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Univ Estadual Paulista/UNESP, São José dos Campos, SP, CEP 12245-000, Brazil.
Leandro Wagner Figueira1 Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Univ Estadual Paulista/UNESP, São José dos Campos, SP, CEP 12245-000, Brazil.
Felipe Eduardo de Oliveira1 Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Univ Estadual Paulista/UNESP, São José dos Campos, SP, CEP 12245-000, Brazil.
Cristina Pacheco Soares2 Institute of Research and Development, Universidade do Vale do Paraíba/UNIVAP, São José dos Campos, SP, CEP 12244-000 Brazil.
Samira Estves Afonso Camargo1 Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Univ Estadual Paulista/UNESP, São José dos Campos, SP, CEP 12245-000, Brazil.
Antonio Olavo Cardoso Jorge1 Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Univ Estadual Paulista/UNESP, São José dos Campos, SP, CEP 12245-000, Brazil.
Luciane Dias de Oliveira1 Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Univ Estadual Paulista/UNESP, São José dos Campos, SP, CEP 12245-000, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade do Vale do Paraíba · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

R. officinalis L. is an aromatic plant commonly used as condiment and for medicinal purposes. Biological activities of its extract were evaluated in this study, as antimicrobial effect on mono- and polymicrobial biofilms, cytotoxicity, anti-inflammatory capacity, and genotoxicity. Monomicrobial biofilms of Candida albicans, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus mutans and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and polymicrobial biofilms composed of C. albicans with each bacterium were formed in microplates during 48 h and exposed for 5 min to R. officinalis L. extract (200 mg/mL). Its cytotoxic effect was examined on murine macrophages (RAW 264.7), human gingival fibroblasts (FMM-1), human breast carcinoma cells (MCF-7), and cervical carcinoma cells (HeLa) after exposure to different concentrations of the extract, analyzed by MTT, neutral red (NR), and crystal violet (CV) assays. The anti-inflammatory activity was evaluated on RAW 264.7 non-stimulated or stimulated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Escherichia coli and treated with different concentrations of the extract for 24 h. Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) were quantified by ELISA. Genotoxicity was verified by the frequency of micronuclei (MN) at 1000 cells after exposure to concentrations of the extract for 24 h. Data were analyzed by T-Test or ANOVA and Tukey Test ( P ≤ 0.05). Thus, significant reductions in colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) were observed in all biofilms. Regarding the cells, it was observed that concentrations ≤ 50 mg/mL provided cell viability of above 50%. Production of proinflammatory cytokines in the treated groups was similar or lower compared to the control group. The MN frequency in the groups exposed to extract was similar or less than the untreated group. It was shown that R. officinalis L. extract was effective on mono- and polymicrobial biofilms; it also provided cell viability of above 50% (at ≤ 50 mg/mL), showed anti-inflammatory effect, and was not genotoxic. Impact statement Rosmarinus officinalis L. extract effectively contributed to in vitro control of important species of microorganisms such as Candida albicans, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus mutans, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in mono- and polymicrobial biofilms that are responsible for several infections in oral cavity as in other regions of the body. Furthermore, this extract promoted also cell viability above 50% at concentrations ≤ 50 mg/mL, excellent anti-inflammatory effect, showing inhibition or reduction of the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines, being also non-genotoxic to cell lines studied. Thus, this extract may be a promising therapeutic agent that can be added in some medical and dental formulations such as toothpastes, mouthwashes, irrigating root canals, ointments, soaps, in order to control pathogenic microorganisms and biofilms, with anti-inflammatory effect and absence of cytotoxic and genotoxic.

Indexed as

RosmarinusAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiofilmsCandida albicansCytotoxinsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEnterococcus faecalisFibroblastsHeLa CellsHumansMCF-7 CellsMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPlant ExtractsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCytotoxinsPlant Extractsantibiofilm activityanti-inflammatory activityantimutagenic activityantiproliferative activityRosmarinus officinalis L.

Identifiers

PMID28093936
PMCPMC5685262
OpenAlexW2579389641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.