Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28093629›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2017

Liquid release as a source of potential drug exposure during the handling of intravenous infusions in nursing.

Verena Segner, Renate Kimbel, Philipp Jochems, André Heinemann, Stephan Letzel, Daniel Wollschläger, Bernd Roßbach

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of long-term data on surface contamination by antineoplastic drugs in pharmacies.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Verena SegnerInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 67, 55131, Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8326-7605
Renate KimbelInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 67, 55131, Mainz, Germany. kimbeluz@uni-mainz.de.
Philipp JochemsInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 67, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
André HeinemannGerman Social Accident Insurance Institution for the Health and Welfare Services (BGW), Cologne, Germany.
Stephan LetzelInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 67, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Daniel WollschlägerInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Bernd RoßbachInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 67, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims at experimentally determining the incidence and extent of liquid releases onto the operator's hands and into the work environment during common nursing operations involving infusions.

methodsA sequence of operations related to the preparation and administration of infusions was conducted by three subjects for 15 times each using fluorescein marked infusion solutions and two different infusion sets (standard set vs. safety-optimized set). Unintended release of liquid was quantified by glove and surface wipe sampling and HPLC/FD analysis of the samples. Operations concerning the disposal of infusions were also part of the study.

resultsIn over 90% of the simulations, a release of infusion solution was observed in a standard workflow, comprising priming and decapping the infusion set, connecting it to a peripheral intravenous (IV) cannula, and detaching it again. Based on median values (229 vs. 26 μl), the release of infusion solution was about ninefold higher when using the non-optimized standard infusion set. During decapping, a hand contamination was found in a majority of cases.

conclusionsThe handling of infusions may involve a risk of nurses' exposure to active agents by release of infusion solution into the work environment. According to our results with different infusion sets, exposure risks can be reduced technically and by appropriate handling. Nevertheless, hand contaminations found for both sets emphasize the necessity for additional measures such as more consistent use of protective gloves.

Indexed as

Equipment ContaminationNursesEnvironmental MonitoringFluoresceinGloves, ProtectiveHumansInfusions, IntravenousOccupational ExposureWorkplaceFluoresceinAmbient monitoringHealthcareInfusionsNursingOccupational drug exposureWipe sampling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.