Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28093615›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2017

The Open Abdomen Route by EuraHS: introduction of the data set and initial results of procedures and procedure-related complications.

A Willms, F Muysoms, C Güsgen, R Schwab, J Lock, S Schaaf, C Germer, I Richardsen, U Dietz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Mesh-augmented versus direct abdominal closure in patients undergoing open abdomen treatment.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

A WillmsDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital, Ruebenacherstrasse 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany. ArnulfWillms@gmx.de.
F MuysomsDepartment of Surgery, AZ Maria Middelares, Buitenring Sint-Denijs, 30, Ghent, Belgium.
C GüsgenDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital, Ruebenacherstrasse 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany.
R SchwabDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital, Ruebenacherstrasse 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany.
J LockDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany.
S SchaafDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital, Ruebenacherstrasse 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany.
C GermerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany.
I RichardsenDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital, Ruebenacherstrasse 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany.
U DietzDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany.
Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEBundeswehrAZ Maria Middelares · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOpen abdomen management has become a well-established strategy in the treatment of serious intra-abdominal pathologies. Key objectives are fistula prevention and high fascial closure rates. The current level of evidence on laparostoma is insufficient. This is due to the rareness of laparostomas, the heterogeneity of study cohorts, and broad diversity of techniques. Collecting data in a standardised, multicentre registry is necessary to draw up evidence-based guidelines. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn order to improve the level of evidence on laparostomy, CAMIN (surgical working group for military and emergency surgery) of DGAV (German Society for General and Visceral Surgery), initiated the implementation of a laparostomy registry. This registry was established as the Open Abdomen Route by EuraHS (European Registry of Abdominal Wall Hernias). Key objectives include collection of data, quality assurance, standardisation of therapeutic concepts and the development of guidelines. Since 1 May 2015, the registry is available as an online database called Open Abdomen Route of EuraHS (European Registry of Abdominal Wall Hernias). It includes 11 categories for data collection, including three scheduled follow-up examinations.

resultsAs part of this pilot study, all entries of the first 120 days were analysed, resulting in a review of 82 patients. At 44%, secondary peritonitis was the predominant indication. The mortality rate was 22%. A comparison of methods with and without fascial traction reveals fascial closure rates of 67% and 25%, respectively (intention-to-treat analysis, p < 0.03). Inert visceral protection was used in 67% of patients and achieved a small bowel fistula incidence of only 5.5%. DISCUSSION: Optimising laparostomy management techniques in order to achieve low incidence of fistulation and high fascial closure rates is possible. The method that ensures the best possible outcome-based on current evidence-would involve fascial traction, visceral protection and negative pressure. The laparostomy registry is a useful tool for quickly generating sufficient evidence for open abdomen treatment.

Indexed as

Abdominal Wound Closure TechniquesHernia, VentralRegistriesAbdomenAbdominal WallAdultAgedContraindicationsFemaleHumansLaparotomyMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsAbdominal compartement syndromeAbdominal traumaLaparostomaOpen abdomenPeritonitis

Identifiers

PMID28093615
OpenAlexW2575356922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.