Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28093555›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Variance and invariance of neuronal long-term representations.

Claudia Clopath, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Mark Hübener, Tobias Rose

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Representational drift in barrel cortex is receptive field dependent.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Principles of nociceptive coding in the anterior cingulate cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Claudia ClopathBioengineering Department, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Tobias BonhoefferMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Mark HübenerMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Tobias RoseMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany trose@neuro.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7156-4714

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain extracts behaviourally relevant sensory input to produce appropriate motor output. On the one hand, our constantly changing environment requires this transformation to be plastic. On the other hand, plasticity is thought to be balanced by mechanisms ensuring constancy of neuronal representations in order to achieve stable behavioural performance. Yet, prominent changes in synaptic strength and connectivity also occur during normal sensory experience, indicating a certain degree of constitutive plasticity. This raises the question of how stable neuronal representations are on the population level and also on the single neuron level. Here, we review recent data from longitudinal electrophysiological and optical recordings of single-cell activity that assess the long-term stability of neuronal stimulus selectivities under conditions of constant sensory experience, during learning, and after reversible modification of sensory input. The emerging picture is that neuronal representations are stabilized by behavioural relevance and that the degree of long-term tuning stability and perturbation resistance directly relates to the functional role of the respective neurons, cell types and circuits. Using a 'toy' model, we show that stable baseline representations and precise recovery from perturbations in visual cortex could arise from a 'backbone' of strong recurrent connectivity between similarly tuned cells together with a small number of 'anchor' neurons exempt from plastic changes.This article is part of the themed issue 'Integrating Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity'.

Indexed as

BehaviorLearningSensationAnimalsElectrophysiological PhenomenaModels, NeurologicalNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsOptical PhenomenaSingle-Cell AnalysisVisual CortexCa2+ imagingchronic electrophysiologycircuit modelplasticitystabilitytwo-photon imaging

Identifiers

PMID28093555
PMCPMC5247593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.