Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28093422›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2017

GPs' perceptions of workload in England: a qualitative interview study.

Caroline Hd Croxson, Helen F Ashdown, Fd Richard Hobbs

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
21.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. GP workforce sustainability to maximise effective and equitable patient care: a realist review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Understanding access to general practice through the lens of candidacy: a critical review of the literature.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Review
  16. GP workload and patient safety.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The real work of general practice: understanding our hidden workload.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caroline Hd CroxsonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Helen F AshdownNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Fd Richard HobbsNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2014-07-052Department of Health IS-SPC-0514-10043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGPs report the lowest levels of morale among doctors, job satisfaction is low, and the GP workforce is diminishing. Workload is frequently cited as negatively impacting on commitment to a career in general practice, and many GPs report that their workload is unmanageable.

aimTo gather an in-depth understanding of GPs' perceptions and attitudes towards workload. DESIGN AND

settingAll GPs working within NHS England were eligible. Advertisements were circulated via regional GP e-mail lists and national social media networks in June 2015. Of those GPs who responded, a maximum-variation sample was selected until data saturation was reached.

methodSemi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted. Data were analysed thematically.

resultsIn total, 171 GPs responded, and 34 were included in this study. GPs described an increase in workload over recent years, with current working days being long and intense, raising concerns over the wellbeing of GPs and patients. Full-time partnership was generally not considered to be possible, and many participants felt workload was unsustainable, particularly given the diminishing workforce. Four major themes emerged to explain increased workload: increased patient needs and expectations; a changing relationship between primary and secondary care; bureaucracy and resources; and the balance of workload within a practice. Continuity of care was perceived as being eroded by changes in contracts and working patterns to deal with workload.

conclusionThis study highlights the urgent need to address perceived lack of investment and clinical capacity in general practice, and suggests that managing patient expectations around what primary care can deliver, and reducing bureaucracy, have become key issues, at least until capacity issues are resolved.

Indexed as

General PracticeJob SatisfactionAttitude of Health PersonnelContractsEnglandGeneral PractitionersHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchWorkforceWorkloadgeneral practicegeneral practitionerspatient expectationspatients’ needsprimary health carequalitative researchworkload

Identifiers

PMID28093422
PMCPMC5308120
OpenAlexW2574303704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.