ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017
Protein multiple sequence alignment benchmarking through secondary structure prediction.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beta Sandwich-Like Folds: Sequences, Contacts, Classification of Invariant Substructures and Beta Sandwich Protein Grammar.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Deep learning for protein secondary structure prediction: Pre and post-AlphaFold.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- RNAlign2D: a rapid method for combined RNA structure and sequence-based alignment using a pseudo-amino acid substitution matrix.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- QuanTest2: benchmarking multiple sequence alignments using secondary structure prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- The Dundee Resource for Sequence Analysis and Structure Prediction.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2020Article
- Deep learning methods in protein structure prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- A Structurally-Validated Multiple Sequence Alignment of 497 Human Protein Kinase Domains.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- A subfamily roadmap of the evolutionarily diverse glycoside hydrolase family 16 (GH16).The Journal of biological chemistry · 2019Article
- MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Evaluating Statistical Multiple Sequence Alignment in Comparison to Other Alignment Methods on Protein Data Sets.Systematic biology · 2019Article
- A novel algorithm for parameter estimation of Hidden Markov Model inspired by Ant Colony Optimization.Heliyon · 2019Article
- PASTA for proteins.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Parallelization of MAFFT for large-scale multiple sequence alignments.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Clustal Omega for making accurate alignments of many protein sequences.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018Article
- Disease Sequences High-Accuracy Alignment Based on the Precision Medicine.BioMed research international · 2018Article
- GET_PHYLOMARKERS, a Software Package to Select Optimal Orthologous Clusters for Phylogenomics and Inferring Pan-Genome Phylogenies, Used for a Critical Geno-Taxonomic Revision of the GenusFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is commonly used to analyze sets of homologous protein or DNA sequences. This has lead to the development of many methods and packages for MSA over the past 30 years. Being able to compare different methods has been problematic and has relied on gold standard benchmark datasets of 'true' alignments or on MSA simulations. A number of protein benchmark datasets have been produced which rely on a combination of manual alignment and/or automated superposition of protein structures. These are either restricted to very small MSAs with few sequences or require manual alignment which can be subjective. In both cases, it remains very difficult to properly test MSAs of more than a few dozen sequences. PREFAB and HomFam both rely on using a small subset of sequences of known structure and do not fairly test the quality of a full MSA. Results: In this paper we describe QuanTest, a fully automated and highly scalable test system for protein MSAs which is based on using secondary structure prediction accuracy (SSPA) to measure alignment quality. This is based on the assumption that better MSAs will give more accurate secondary structure predictions when we include sequences of known structure. SSPA measures the quality of an entire alignment however, not just the accuracy on a handful of selected sequences. It can be scaled to alignments of any size but here we demonstrate its use on alignments of either 200 or 1000 sequences. This allows the testing of slow accurate programs as well as faster, less accurate ones. We show that the scores from QuanTest are highly correlated with existing benchmark scores. We also validate the method by comparing a wide range of MSA alignment options and by including different levels of mis-alignment into MSA, and examining the effects on the scores. Availability and Implementation: QuanTest is available from http://www.bioinf.ucd.ie/download/QuanTest.tgz. Contact: quan.le@ucd.ie. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.