Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28093407›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

Protein multiple sequence alignment benchmarking through secondary structure prediction.

Quan Le, Fabian Sievers, Desmond G Higgins

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Deep learning for protein secondary structure prediction: Pre and post-AlphaFold.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Dundee Resource for Sequence Analysis and Structure Prediction.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2020
    Article
  6. Deep learning methods in protein structure prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. PASTA for proteins.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Clustal Omega for making accurate alignments of many protein sequences.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Quan LeConway Institute, UCD School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Fabian SieversConway Institute, UCD School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Desmond G HigginsConway Institute, UCD School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
University College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is commonly used to analyze sets of homologous protein or DNA sequences. This has lead to the development of many methods and packages for MSA over the past 30 years. Being able to compare different methods has been problematic and has relied on gold standard benchmark datasets of 'true' alignments or on MSA simulations. A number of protein benchmark datasets have been produced which rely on a combination of manual alignment and/or automated superposition of protein structures. These are either restricted to very small MSAs with few sequences or require manual alignment which can be subjective. In both cases, it remains very difficult to properly test MSAs of more than a few dozen sequences. PREFAB and HomFam both rely on using a small subset of sequences of known structure and do not fairly test the quality of a full MSA. Results: In this paper we describe QuanTest, a fully automated and highly scalable test system for protein MSAs which is based on using secondary structure prediction accuracy (SSPA) to measure alignment quality. This is based on the assumption that better MSAs will give more accurate secondary structure predictions when we include sequences of known structure. SSPA measures the quality of an entire alignment however, not just the accuracy on a handful of selected sequences. It can be scaled to alignments of any size but here we demonstrate its use on alignments of either 200 or 1000 sequences. This allows the testing of slow accurate programs as well as faster, less accurate ones. We show that the scores from QuanTest are highly correlated with existing benchmark scores. We also validate the method by comparing a wide range of MSA alignment options and by including different levels of mis-alignment into MSA, and examining the effects on the scores. Availability and Implementation: QuanTest is available from http://www.bioinf.ucd.ie/download/QuanTest.tgz. Contact: quan.le@ucd.ie. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Protein Structure, SecondarySoftwareAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceBenchmarkingComputational BiologyData AccuracySequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, Protein

Identifiers

PMID28093407
PMCPMC5408826
OpenAlexW2572546015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.