Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28093085›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2017

Gene design, fusion technology and TEV cleavage conditions influence the purification of oxidized disulphide-rich venom peptides in Escherichia coli.

Ana Filipa Sequeira, Jeremy Turchetto, Natalie J Saez, Fanny Peysson, Laurie Ramond, Yoan Duhoo, Marilyne Blémont, Vânia O Fernandes, Luís T Gama, Luís M A Ferreira and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prospects and challenges of recombinant spider venom enzymes: insights fromFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The structure of aJournal of structural biology: X · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ana Filipa SequeiraCIISA-Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477, Lisbon, Portugal.
Jeremy TurchettoUnité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7257, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Aix-Marseille Université, Architecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques (AFMB), Marseille, France.
Natalie J SaezUnité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7257, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Aix-Marseille Université, Architecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques (AFMB), Marseille, France.
Fanny PeyssonUnité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7257, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Aix-Marseille Université, Architecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques (AFMB), Marseille, France.
Laurie RamondUnité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7257, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Aix-Marseille Université, Architecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques (AFMB), Marseille, France.
Yoan DuhooUnité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7257, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Aix-Marseille Université, Architecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques (AFMB), Marseille, France.
Marilyne BlémontUnité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7257, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Aix-Marseille Université, Architecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques (AFMB), Marseille, France.
Vânia O FernandesCIISA-Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477, Lisbon, Portugal.
Luís T GamaCIISA-Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477, Lisbon, Portugal.
Luís M A FerreiraCIISA-Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477, Lisbon, Portugal.
Catarina I P I GuerreiroNZYtech Genes & Enzymes, Campus do Lumiar, Estrada do paço do Lumiar, 1649-038, Lisbon, Portugal.
Nicolas GillesCEA/DRF/iBiTecS, Service d'Ingénierie Moléculaire des Protéines, 91191, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France.
Hervé DarbonUnité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7257, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Aix-Marseille Université, Architecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques (AFMB), Marseille, France.
Carlos M G A FontesCIISA-Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477, Lisbon, Portugal.
Renaud VincentelliUnité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 7257, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Aix-Marseille Université, Architecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques (AFMB), Marseille, France. renaud.vincentelli@afmb.univ-mrs.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9667-0196
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Lisbon · PTCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRNzytech (Portugal) · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnimal venoms are large, complex libraries of bioactive, disulphide-rich peptides. These peptides, and their novel biological activities, are of increasing pharmacological and therapeutic importance. However, recombinant expression of venom peptides in Escherichia coli remains difficult due to the significant number of cysteine residues requiring effective post-translational processing. There is also an urgent need to develop high-throughput recombinant protocols applicable to the production of reticulated peptides to enable efficient screening of their drug potential. Here, a comprehensive study was developed to investigate how synthetic gene design, choice of fusion tag, compartment of expression, tag removal conditions and protease recognition site affect levels of solubility of oxidized venom peptides produced in E. coli.

resultsThe data revealed that expression of venom peptides imposes significant pressure on cysteine codon selection. DsbC was the best fusion tag for venom peptide expression, in particular when the fusion was directed to the bacterial periplasm. While the redox activity of DsbC was not essential to maximize expression of recombinant fusion proteins, redox activity did lead to higher levels of correctly folded target peptides. With the exception of proline, the canonical TEV protease recognition site tolerated all other residues at its C-terminus, confirming that no non-native residues, which might affect activity, need to be incorporated at the N-terminus of recombinant peptides for tag removal.

conclusionsThis study reveals that E. coli is a convenient heterologous host for the expression of soluble and functional venom peptides. Using the optimal construct design, a large and diverse range of animal venom peptides were produced in the µM scale. These results open up new possibilities for the high-throughput production of recombinant disulphide-rich peptides in E. coli.

Indexed as

Peptide BiosynthesisAnimalsBiotechnologyCloning, MolecularDisulfidesEndopeptidasesEscherichia coliGenetic VectorsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysOxidation-ReductionPeptidesPeriplasmRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSolubilityVenomsDisulfidesEndopeptidasesPeptidesRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTEV proteaseVenomsDisulphide-rich peptidesEscherichia coli (E. coli)Fusion proteinGene designHigh-throughput expressionPeriplasmRecombinant expressionVenom peptides

Identifiers

PMID28093085
PMCPMC5240416
OpenAlexW2563948931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.