Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28093073›Full record

ReviewGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2017

Application of meta-omics techniques to understand greenhouse gas emissions originating from ruminal metabolism.

Robert J Wallace, Timothy J Snelling, Christine A McCartney, Ilma Tapio, Francesco Strozzi

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Ruminal microbiota-host interaction and its effect on nutrient metabolism.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A common vaginal microbiota composition among breeds of Bos taurus indicus (Gyr and Nellore).Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Robert J WallaceRowett Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB16 5BD, UK. john.wallace@abdn.ac.uk.
Timothy J SnellingRowett Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB16 5BD, UK.
Christine A McCartneyRowett Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB16 5BD, UK.
Ilma TapioGreen Technology, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Jokioinen, Finland.
Francesco StrozziPTP, Via Einstein - Loc. Cascina Codazza, 26900, Lodi, Italy.
University of Aberdeen · GBNatural Resources Institute Finland · FIParco Tecnologico Padano · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methane emissions from ruminal fermentation contribute significantly to total anthropological greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. New meta-omics technologies are beginning to revolutionise our understanding of the rumen microbial community structure, metabolic potential and metabolic activity. Here we explore these developments in relation to GHG emissions. Microbial rumen community analyses based on small subunit ribosomal RNA sequence analysis are not yet predictive of methane emissions from individual animals or treatments. Few metagenomics studies have been directly related to GHG emissions. In these studies, the main genes that differed in abundance between high and low methane emitters included archaeal genes involved in methanogenesis, with others that were not apparently related to methane metabolism. Unlike the taxonomic analysis up to now, the gene sets from metagenomes may have predictive value. Furthermore, metagenomic analysis predicts metabolic function better than only a taxonomic description, because different taxa share genes with the same function. Metatranscriptomics, the study of mRNA transcript abundance, should help to understand the dynamic of microbial activity rather than the gene abundance; to date, only one study has related the expression levels of methanogenic genes to methane emissions, where gene abundance failed to do so. Metaproteomics describes the proteins present in the ecosystem, and is therefore arguably a better indication of microbial metabolism. Both two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and shotgun peptide sequencing methods have been used for ruminal analysis. In our unpublished studies, both methods showed an abundance of archaeal methanogenic enzymes, but neither was able to discriminate high and low emitters. Metabolomics can take several forms that appear to have predictive value for methane emissions; ruminal metabolites, milk fatty acid profiles, faecal long-chain alcohols and urinary metabolites have all shown promising results. Rumen microbial amino acid metabolism lies at the root of excessive nitrogen emissions from ruminants, yet only indirect inferences for nitrogen emissions can be drawn from meta-omics studies published so far. Annotation of meta-omics data depends on databases that are generally weak in rumen microbial entries. The Hungate 1000 project and Global Rumen Census initiatives are therefore essential to improve the interpretation of sequence/metabolic information.

Indexed as

FermentationMetabolomeMetabolomicsAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingMetagenomeMetagenomicsMethaneNitrogenProteomeProteomicsRumenRuminantsTranscriptomeMethaneNitrogenProteome

Identifiers

PMID28093073
PMCPMC5240273
OpenAlexW2578882462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.