Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28092785›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)2017

Integrated SSFP for functional brain mapping at 7T with reduced susceptibility artifact.

Kaibao Sun, Rong Xue, Peng Zhang, Zhentao Zuo, Zhongwei Chen, Bo Wang, Thomas Martin, Yi Wang, Lin Chen, Sheng He and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kaibao SunState Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Beijing MRI Center for Brain Research, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Rong XueState Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Beijing MRI Center for Brain Research, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing 100053, China. Electronic address: rxue@bcslab.ibp.ac.cn.
Peng ZhangState Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Beijing MRI Center for Brain Research, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Zhentao ZuoState Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Beijing MRI Center for Brain Research, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Zhongwei ChenState Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Beijing MRI Center for Brain Research, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Bo WangState Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Beijing MRI Center for Brain Research, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Thomas MartinDepartment of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles 90095, United States.
Yi WangDepartment of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles 90095, United States.
Lin ChenState Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Beijing MRI Center for Brain Research, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; The Innovation Center of Excellence on Brain Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China. Electronic address: linchen@bcslab.ibp.ac.cn.
Sheng HeState Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Beijing MRI Center for Brain Research, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
Danny J J WangDepartment of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles 90095, United States; Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

Imaging Cerebral and Retinal Microvasculature in Cerebral Small Vessel DiseaseUH2NS100614 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KASHANI, AMIR H, RINGMAN, JOHN M · 2016 to 2017
$2.4M
Non-contrast 4-D Dynamic MRA in Arteriovenous Malformation (AVM)R01EB014922 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI WANG, DANNY JJ · 2013 to 2016
$1.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB014922NINDS NIH HHS UH2 NS100614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) offers an alternative and potentially important tool to the standard gradient-echo echo-planar imaging (GE-EPI) for functional MRI (fMRI). Both passband and transition band based bSSFP have been proposed for fMRI. The applications of these methods, however, are limited by banding artifacts due to the sensitivity of bSSFP signal to off-resonance effects. In this article, a unique case of the SSFP-FID sequence, termed integrated-SSFP or iSSFP, was proposed to overcome the obstacle by compressing the SSFP profile into the width of a single voxel. The magnitude of the iSSFP signal was kept constant irrespective of frequency shift. Visual stimulation studies were performed to demonstrate the feasibility of fMRI using iSSFP at 7T with flip angles of 4° and 25°, compared to standard bSSFP and gradient echo (GRE) imaging. The signal changes for the complex iSSFP signal in activated voxels were 2.48±0.53 (%) and 2.96±0.87 (%) for flip angles (FA) of 4° and 25° respectively at the TR of 9.88ms. Simultaneous multi-slice acquisition (SMS) with the CAIPIRIHNA technique was carried out with iSSFP scanning to detect the anterior temporal lobe activation using a semantic processing task fMRI, compared with standard 2D GE-EPI. This study demonstrates the feasibility of iSSFP for fMRI with reduced susceptibility artifacts, while maintaining robust functional contrast at 7T.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsArtifactsBrain MappingComputer SimulationEcho-Planar ImagingElectromagnetic FieldsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMental ProcessesTemporal LobeYoung AdultfMRIIntegrated SSFP (iSSFP)SemanticSusceptibility artifactUltrahigh magnetic field

Identifiers

PMID28092785
PMCPMC5336405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.