Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28092777›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2017

Controlling the 3D architecture of Self-Lifting Auto-generated Tissue Equivalents (SLATEs) for optimized corneal graft composition and stability.

Ricardo M Gouveia, Elena González-Andrades, Juan C Cardona, Carmen González-Gallardo, Ana M Ionescu, Ingrid Garzon, Miguel Alaminos, Miguel González-Andrades, Che J Connon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Mechanical Properties of Bioengineered Corneal Stroma.Advanced healthcare materials · 2021
    Review
  7. Engineering fiber anisotropy within natural collagen hydrogels.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Prospects and Challenges of Translational Corneal Bioprinting.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Nanotechnology in regenerative ophthalmology.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2019
    Review
  12. Corneal pain and experimental model development.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Corneal Repair and Regeneration: Current Concepts and Future Directions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ricardo M GouveiaInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, International Centre for Life, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
Elena González-AndradesTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Juan C CardonaLaboratory of Biomaterials and Optics, Optics Department, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Carmen González-GallardoSan Cecilio University Hospital, Ophthalmology Service, Granada, Spain.
Ana M IonescuLaboratory of Biomaterials and Optics, Optics Department, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Ingrid GarzonTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Miguel AlaminosTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Miguel González-AndradesSchepens Eye Research Institute and Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: miguel_gonzalez@meei.harvard.edu.
Che J ConnonInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, International Centre for Life, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK. Electronic address: che.connon@newcastle.ac.uk.
Universidad de Granada · ESCentre for Life · GBHarvard University · USInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada · ESNewcastle University · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I008187/1Medical Research Council MR/K017217/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ideally, biomaterials designed to play specific physical and physiological roles in vivo should comprise components and microarchitectures analogous to those of the native tissues they intend to replace. For that, implantable biomaterials need to be carefully designed to have the correct structural and compositional properties, which consequently impart their bio-function. In this study, we showed that the control of such properties can be defined from the bottom-up, using smart surface templates to modulate the structure, composition, and bio-mechanics of human transplantable tissues. Using multi-functional peptide amphiphile-coated surfaces with different anisotropies, we were able to control the phenotype of corneal stromal cells and instruct them to fabricate self-lifting tissues that closely emulated the native stromal lamellae of the human cornea. The type and arrangement of the extracellular matrix comprising these corneal stromal Self-Lifting Analogous Tissue Equivalents (SLATEs) were then evaluated in detail, and was shown to correlate with tissue function. Specifically, SLATEs comprising aligned collagen fibrils were shown to be significantly thicker, denser, and more resistant to proteolytic degradation compared to SLATEs formed with randomly-oriented constituents. In addition, SLATEs were highly transparent while providing increased absorption to near-UV radiation. Importantly, corneal stromal SLATEs were capable of constituting tissues with a higher-order complexity, either by creating thicker tissues through stacking or by serving as substrate to support a fully-differentiated, stratified corneal epithelium. SLATEs were also deemed safe as implants in a rabbit corneal model, being capable of integrating with the surrounding host tissue without provoking inflammation, neo-vascularization, or any other signs of rejection after a 9-months follow-up. This work thus paves the way for the de novo bio-fabrication of easy-retrievable, scaffold-free human tissues with controlled structural, compositional, and functional properties to replace corneal, as well as other, tissues.

Indexed as

Biomimetic MaterialsCells, CulturedCorneaCorneal StromaCorneal TransplantationEpithelium, CornealHumansPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringCorneal stromaSLATEsTissue templating

Identifiers

PMID28092777
PMCPMC5267636
OpenAlexW2563447484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.