Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28092466›Full record

Trial reportExpert review of molecular diagnostics2017

Clinical performance of the Solana® Point-of-Care Trichomonas Assay from clinician-collected vaginal swabs and urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic women.

C A Gaydos, J Schwebke, J Dombrowski, J Marrazzo, J Coleman, B Silver, M Barnes, L Crane, P Fine

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Expert review of molecular diagnostics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2021
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Trichomoniasis.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Rapid and point-of-care tests for the diagnosis ofSexually transmitted infections · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

C A Gaydosa Division of Infectious Diseases , Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore , Maryland , USA.
J Schwebkeb Division of Infectious Diseases , University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine , Birmingham , Alabama , USA.
J Dombrowskic Division of Infectious Diseases , University of Washington School of Medicine , Seattle , Washigton , USA.
J Marrazzob Division of Infectious Diseases , University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine , Birmingham , Alabama , USA.
J Colemana Division of Infectious Diseases , Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore , Maryland , USA.
B Silvera Division of Infectious Diseases , Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore , Maryland , USA.
M Barnesa Division of Infectious Diseases , Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore , Maryland , USA.
L Craned Planned Parenthood , Houston , Texas , USA.
P Fined Planned Parenthood , Houston , Texas , USA.

Funding

TrainingU54EB007958 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI William Owen Osburn · 2007 to 2026
$34.6M
HIV Prevention Trials Network: Network LaboratoryU01AI068613 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ESHLEMAN, SUSAN H · 2006 to 2010
$16.5M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068613NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB007958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSolana® (Quidel) is a new rapid (<40 min.) point-of-care (POC) test for qualitative detection of Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) DNA. The assay has two steps: 1) specimen preparation, and 2) amplification and detection using isothermal Helicase-Dependent Amplification (HDA). The objective was to demonstrate the performance of Solana for vaginal swabs and female urines based on comparison to wet mount and TV culture. Performance was also compared to the Aptima-TV assay.

methodsUrine and four clinician-collected vaginal swabs were collected. The first two were used for FDA composite reference (wet mount; InPouch TV Culture). The third swab was used for Solana. Sensitivity/specificity were based on the reference method. A specimen was considered positive if either test was positive. The fourth swab was for Aptima-TV.

resultsVaginal swabs and urines were obtained from 501 asymptomatic and 543 symptomatic women. Prevalence of TV by was 11.5%. For swabs, Solana® demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity from asymptomatic (100%/98.9%) and symptomatic (98.6%/98.5%) women, as well as for urines from asymptomatic (98.0%/98.4%) and symptomatic (92.9%/97.9%) women, compared to the reference method. Compared to Aptima-TV, the sensitivity/specificity was 89.7%/99.0% for swabs and 100%/98.9% for urines.

conclusionThe Solana® assay performed well compared to the reference assays.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPoint-of-Care SystemsTrichomonas vaginalisTrichomonas VaginitisAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansSensitivity and SpecificityVaginal Smearspoint-of-care testSolanaTrichomonas vaginalistrichomoniasis

Identifiers

PMID28092466
PMCPMC5615814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.