Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28092262›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Vocal development in a Waddington landscape.

Yayoi Teramoto, Daniel Y Takahashi, Philip Holmes, Asif A Ghazanfar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Defects of Epigenetic Reprogramming in Dox-Dependent Porcine-iPSCs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Internal states and extrinsic factors both determine monkey vocal production.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yayoi TeramotoPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3419-0351
Daniel Y TakahashiPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.
Philip HolmesPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.
Asif A GhazanfarPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1960-7470

Funding

The social neurobiology of vocal production and perceptionR01NS054898 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI GHAZANFAR, ASIF · 2007 to 2022
$5.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vocal development is the adaptive coordination of the vocal apparatus, muscles, the nervous system, and social interaction. Here, we use a quantitative framework based on optimal control theory and Waddington's landscape metaphor to provide an integrated view of this process. With a biomechanical model of the marmoset monkey vocal apparatus and behavioral developmental data, we show that only the combination of the developing vocal tract, vocal apparatus muscles and nervous system can fully account for the patterns of vocal development. Together, these elements influence the shape of the monkeys' vocal developmental landscape, tilting, rotating or shifting it in different ways. We can thus use this framework to make quantitative predictions regarding how interfering factors or experimental perturbations can change the landscape within a species, or to explain comparative differences in vocal development across species.

Indexed as

Vocalization, AnimalAnimalsCallithrixModels, Biologicaldevelopmental systemsepigenetic landscapemarmoset monkeyneuromechanicsneurosciencesongbirdvocal tract resonance

Identifiers

PMID28092262
PMCPMC5310845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.