SynthesisJournal of behavioral addictions2016
Examining personalized feedback interventions for gambling disorders: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Preventive Interventions and Harm Reduction in Online and Electronic Gambling: A Systematic Review.Journal of gambling studies · 2023Pooled it
- Preventive Gambling Programs for Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Internet Delivered Interventions for Gambling: Prevention, Harm Reduction and Early Intervention.Journal of gambling studies · 2022Pooled it
- The efficacy of Personalized Normative Feedback interventions across addictions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Preventive Programs for Reducing Problem Gambling Behaviors Among Young Adults.Journal of gambling studies · 2020Pooled it
- A Meta-analysis of Brief Personalized Feedback Interventions for Problematic Gambling.Journal of gambling studies · 2019Pooled it
- Measuring treatment outcomes in gambling disorders: a systematic review.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2018Pooled it
- Efficacy of face-to-face versus self-guided treatments for disordered gambling: A meta-analysis.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2017Pooled it
- Reducing gambling harm through digital self-help intervention: a pilot study in mild to moderate gambling disorder.Harm reduction journal · 2026Trial
- Online Self-Directed Interventions for Gambling Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of gambling studies · 2019Trial
- Professionals' Perspectives On the Role of Advanced Technologies in Responsible Gambling.Journal of gambling studies · 2026Article
- Playing Sports, Placing Sports Bets? Sports Club Membership, Gambling Norms and Sports Gambling Behavior among Flemish Youth.Journal of gambling studies · 2026Article
- Clinical consensus statements on change techniques for gambling treatment: A Delphi study with clinicians.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2025Article
- Exploring the Users' Perspective of the Nationwide Self-Exclusion Service for Gambling Disorder, "Spelpaus": Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Too Young to Gamble: Long-term Risks from Underage Gambling.Journal of gambling studies · 2024Article
- The role of contextual factors in avenues to recover from gambling disorder: a scoping review.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Client's Experiences Using a Location-Based Technology ICT System during Gambling Treatments' Crucial Components: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Engagement With Personalized Feedback for Emotional Distress Among College Students at Elevated Suicide Risk.Behavior therapy · 2022Article
- A Normative Feedback Intervention on Gambling Behavior-A Longitudinal Study of Post-Intervention Gambling Practices in At-Risk Gamblers.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Does Gambling Identity Predict Unique Variance in Negative Gambling-Related Outcomes: An Examination of Direct and Interactive Associations.Journal of gambling studies · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims Personalized feedback interventions (PFI) have shown success as a low-cost, scalable intervention for reducing problematic and excessive consumption of alcohol. Recently, researchers have begun to apply PFI as an intervention method for problematic gambling behaviors. A systematic review of the literature on PFI as an intervention/prevention method for gambling behaviors was performed. Methods Studies were included if they met the following criteria: the design included both a PFI group and a comparison group, and the interventions focused on gambling prevention and/or reduction. Six relevant studies were found meeting all criteria. Results Results revealed that PFI treatment groups showed decreases in a variety of gambling behaviors as compared to control groups, and perceived norms on gambling behaviors significantly decreased after interventions as compared to control groups. Conclusions Overall, the research suggests that while PFI applied to gambling is still in its infancy, problematic gamblers appear to benefit from programs incorporating PFIs. Further, PFI may also be used as a promising source of preventative measures for individuals displaying at-risk gambling behaviors. While, evidence is still limited, and additional research needs to be conducted with PFI for gambling problems, the preliminary positive results along with the structure of PFI as a scalable and relatively inexpensive intervention method provides promising support for future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.