Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28092185›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2016

The development of the Problematic Series WatchingScale (PSWS).

Gábor Orosz, Beáta Bőthe, István Tóth-Király

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Personality and Behavioral Inhibition/Activation Systems in Behavioral Addiction: Analysis of Binge-Watching.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Associations of Problematic Binge-Watching with Depression, Social Interaction Anxiety, and Loneliness.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gábor OroszInstitute of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University , Budapest, Hungary.
Beáta BőtheInstitute of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University , Budapest, Hungary.
István Tóth-KirályInstitute of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University , Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims The goal of the present study was to create a short ProblematicSeries Watching Scale (PSWS). Methods On the basis of the six components model of Griffiths ( 2005 ), six items were identifiedcovering all components of problematic series watching. Confirmatoryfactor analyses were carried out on two independent samples (N

Indexed as

InternetPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBehavior, AddictiveEducational StatusFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansHungaryMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsCFAProblematic Series Watching ScalePSWSseries watchingsix components model

Identifiers

PMID28092185
PMCPMC5322994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.