Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28092064›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2017

Critical Congenital Heart Disease Newborn Screening Implementation: Lessons Learned.

Monica R McClain, John S Hokanson, Regina Grazel, Kim Van Naarden Braun, Lorraine F Garg, Michelle R Morris, Kathleen Moline, Keri Urquhart, Amy Nance, Harper Randall and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Monica R McClainInstitute on Disability, University of New Hampshire, 10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101, Durham, NH, 03824, USA. Monica.McClain@unh.edu.
John S HokansonUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Regina GrazelNew Jersey Department of Health, Trenton, NJ, USA.
Kim Van Naarden BraunCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Lorraine F GargNew Jersey Department of Health, Trenton, NJ, USA.
Michelle R MorrisVirginia Department of Health, Richmond, VA, USA.
Kathleen MolineVirginia Department of Health, Richmond, VA, USA.
Keri UrquhartMichigan Department of Community Health, Lansing, ME, USA.
Amy NanceUtah Department of Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Harper RandallUtah Department of Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Marci K SontagUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.
New Jersey Department of Health · USUtah Department of Health · USVirginia Department of Health · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USMichigan Department of Health and Human Services · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of New Hampshire · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The purpose of this article is to present the collective experiences of six federally-funded critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) newborn screening implementation projects to assist federal and state policy makers and public health to implement CCHD screening. Methods A qualitative assessment and summary from six demonstration project grantees and other state representatives involved in the implementation of CCHD screening programs are presented in the following areas: legislation, provider and family education, screening algorithms and interpretation, data collection and quality improvement, telemedicine, home and rural births, and neonatal intensive care unit populations. Results The most common challenges to implementation include: lack of uniform legislative and statutory mandates for screening programs, lack of funding/resources, difficulty in screening algorithm interpretation, limited availability of pediatric echocardiography, and integrating data collection and reporting with existing newborn screening systems. Identified solutions include: programs should consider integrating third party insurers and other partners early in the legislative/statutory process; development of visual tools and language modification to assist in the interpretation of algorithms, training programs for adult sonographers to perform neonatal echocardiography, building upon existing newborn screening systems, and using automated data transfer mechanisms. Discussion Continued and expanded surveillance, research, prevention and education efforts are needed to inform screening programs, with an aim to reduce morbidity, mortality and other adverse consequences for individuals and families affected by CCHD.

Indexed as

FemaleHealth Plan ImplementationHealth Services AccessibilityHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansInfant, NewbornNeonatal ScreeningPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementUnited StatesCritical congenital heart diseaseNewborn screeningPublic health

Identifiers

PMID28092064
PMCPMC5663229
OpenAlexW2579178156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.